| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2022 SLG 594 2022 SLD 594 2022 CLD 256 |
Sindh High Court
J.C.M. No. 37 of 2003, decided on 19th March, 2021. Date of hearing: 15th March, 2021.
ZAFAR AHMED RAJPUT, JUSTICE
Nemo for Petitioner No. 1. Shahryar Mirza and Mrs. Noor Naz Agha for Petitioners Nos. 2 to 35. Nemo for
Respondents Nos. 1 and 2. Ejaz Ahmed Sheerazi for claimant Faysal Bank Limited. Muhammad Imtiaz Khan for claimant National Bank Limited.
J.C.M. No. 37 of 2003, decided on 19th March, 2021. Date of hearing: 15th March, 2021.
ZAFAR AHMED RAJPUT, JUSTICE
Nemo for Petitioner No. 1. Shahryar Mirza and Mrs. Noor Naz Agha for Petitioners Nos. 2 to 35. Nemo for
Respondents Nos. 1 and 2. Ejaz Ahmed Sheerazi for claimant Faysal Bank Limited. Muhammad Imtiaz Khan for claimant National Bank Limited.
MUHAMMAD LAEEQ AND 34 OTHErs
VS
SINDH ALKALIES LIMITED AND 2 OTHERS Chaudhry Waseem Iqbal, Official Assignee/Official Liquidator.
Law: Companies Ordinance, 1984
Section: 305,309,311,404,405
Companies Ordinance (XLVII of 1984)--- ----Ss. 305, 309, 311, 404 405---Insolvency (Karachi Division) Act (III of 1909), S. 48 Second Schedule, Rr. 10, 11---Liquidation of assets of company---Debt, proof of---After the respondent company was wound up, the official assignee/official liquidator invited claims from creditors to distribute assets of the company---Applicant Banks filed their claims as secured creditors---Validity---Applicant Banks claimed their charge over auctioned land but in pleadings of their respective Banking suits they did not claim any such charge against auctioned property---No decree existed in favour of applicant Banks for receiving decretal amount through sale of auctioned land---Finance of applicant Banks was secured against other immovable land of respondent company through a charge/mortgage---Insolvency Rules in winding up of company were applicable under S. 404 of Companies Ordinance, 1984---Procedure for admitting secured creditors for the value of claim was provided in Second Schedule enacted under S. 48 of Insolvency (Karachi Division) Act, 1909---No such procedure was applied by secured creditors, therefore, R. 16 of Second Schedule to Insolvency (Karachi Division) Act, 1909, had come in action---Admitted amount of applicants as secured creditors was considered as un-secured however their claims would be paid after preferential claim was released under S. 405 of Companies Ordinance, 1984---High Court directed the official assignee to proceed further for renewal of lease of immovable properties of the company in liquidation---Application was disposed of accordingly. Pakistan Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation Limited v. Messrs Ajma Corporation Ltd. 2014 CLD 1097 rel. ORDER ZAFAR AHMED RAJPUT, J.--- By this common order, I intend to answer References Nos.29 and 30 of 2012 and 31 of 2017 submitted by the learned Official Assignee/Official Liquidator, so also to decide C.M.A. No. 341 of 2017 filed on behalf of Faysal Bank Limited (FBL), under section 151, C.P.C. 2. Learned Official Assignee/Official Liquidator has submitted Reference No. 29 of 2012 through which he has sought approval of this Court to distribute assets ofโฆ
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492