| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2024 SLG 193 2024 SLD 193 2024 PLD 86 |
Lahore High Court
Writ Petition No. 3542 of 2022, heard on 5th October, 2023.Date of hearing: 5th October, 2023.
Before Jawad Hassan, J
Petitioner in person. Malik Muhammad Siddique Awan, Additional Attorney General and Arshad Mahmood Malik, Assistant Attorney General with Sajid Khan, Legal Officer and Madiha Hussain, Legal Assistant for
Respondents.
Writ Petition No. 3542 of 2022, heard on 5th October, 2023.Date of hearing: 5th October, 2023.
Before Jawad Hassan, J
Petitioner in person. Malik Muhammad Siddique Awan, Additional Attorney General and Arshad Mahmood Malik, Assistant Attorney General with Sajid Khan, Legal Officer and Madiha Hussain, Legal Assistant for
Respondents.
KHUSHDIL KHAN MALIK---Petitioner
VERSUS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others---Respondents
Law: Decorations Act, 1975
Section: 3
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 259
Decorations Act (XLIII of 1975)--- ----S. 3---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 259---Institution or creation of decorations---Nomination---Vested right---Scope---Petitioner was nominated for Sitara-i-Imtiaz, but was not conferred the award by President of Pakistan---Validity---Petitioner was employee of an Institution which was attached department of Ministry of Defence under Schedule II of Rules of Business, 1973---Name of petitioner was forwarded by his Institution to the Ministry for further recommendation to Cabinet Division for conferment of the Award in relation to his public service as a civil servant---Ministry of Defence did not further recommend name of petitioner for nomination of the Award---Merely nominating name of petitioner by his parent Department to relevant Division, did not create any legal/vested or fundamental right in his favour---Petitioner neither approached Ministry of Defence nor Cabinet Division for agitating the matter---Merely, recommendation of his name by nominating agency did not create any substantial or fundamental right for conferment of Award in favour of petitioner---High Court declined to direct respondent authority to forward name of petitioner to Cabinet Division---Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances. Muhammad Akbar v. Federation of Pakistan, Ministry of Law and Justice (Justice Division), Islamabad through Secretary and another 1996 SCMR 1017; Nazir A. Khan Swati v. Ministry of Law and Justice and others 1998 PLC (C.S.) 372; Asdullah Mangi and others v. Pakistan International Airlines Corporation and others 2005 SCMR 445; Kamran Martin v. Mst. Siera Bibi and 4 others 2017 PLC (C.S.) 597 and Dr. Imran Khattak and another v. Ms. Sofia Waqar Khattak, PSO to Chief Justice and others 2014 SCMR 122 rel. JUDGMENT JAWAD HASSAN, J.---The Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 (the "Constitution") with the prayer to: 1. declare the acts of the Respondents Nos. 1 to 4, as illegal, unlawful, non-transparent, arbitrary, based on malice and violative of the judgments of the Superior Courts. 2. direct the Respondents Nos. 1 to 3 to consider the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492