Case Details

Citation(s)
2023 SLG 891 2023 SLD 891 2023 MLD 426
Sindh High Court, Sukkur Bench
Criminal Appeal No. S-192 of 2019, decided on 26th November,2021. Date of hearing: 15th October, 2021.
Before Zulfiqar Ali Sangi, J
Muhammad Ali Dayo for Appellant.Khalil Ahmed Maitlo, D.P.G. for the State.

LIAQAT ALI-----AppellantVersusThe STATE-----Respondent

Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Section: 35,35-A,34-B

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----Ss. 35, 35-A, 34-B [as amended by Costs of Litigation Act (XVII of 2017)]---Recovery of damages and litigation costs---Malicious prosecution---Civil litigation---Scope---Dispute between parties related to right of appellant/defendant to continue to use a parcel of land adjacent to his property that respondent/plaintiff claimed was his---Validity---Held, there could be civil proceedings that had undermined right of liberty at an interlocutory or final stage or right to property and/or reputation such as in a claim alleging bankruptcy or failure to abide by financial obligations---Such civil claims, which raised questions regarding probity and honesty of conduct of a claimant, could have consequences for reputation of such claimant, which might not be made whole simply by grant of litigation costs at the end of proceedings---Such was in the context of civil proceedings of such nature (which infringe upon the right to liberty and/or dignity/ reputation and property of a party forced to defend his/her conduct in civil proceedings) that had inflicted damage on appellant/defendant that could lead to a claim for malicious prosecution of civil proceedings---Nature of proceedings between parties was not such that could possibly undermine liberty or reputation of respondent/plaintiff---One of the ingredients in the test for malicious prosecution was not satisfied to the extent that respondent/plaintiff had incurred financial costs during civil proceedings in question---Appropriate remedy for relevant Court was to grant costs to respondent/plaintiff under provisions of Ss. 35, 35-A, 35-B, C.P.C. as amended through Costs of Litigation Act, 2017---For purposes of recovering litigation costs and/or costs in relation to any inconvenience suffered by respondent/plaintiff, no independent cause of action for recovery of damages for tort of malicious prosecution of civil proceedings accrued to respondent/plaintiff---Mere failure of one party to prove a civil claim did not create automatic right for contesting party to bring suit for malicious prosecution---To find otherwise could function as a major deterrent discouraging citizens from…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492