| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2022 SLG 2024 2022 SLD 2024 2022 PLJ 1044 |
Crl. A. Nos. 1435, 1361 Crl. Rev. No. 479 of 2019, heardon 2.3.2022.
SHAKIL AHMAD, J.
M/s. Tariq Mehmood Dogar, Khawaja Qaisar Butt, Nasir Mehmood Balouch. Advocates for Appellants.Mr. Muhammad Javaid Iqbal, Advocate for Complainant.Malik Riaz Ahmed Saghla, Additional Prosecutor General for State.
MUHAMMAD IMRAN and anothersVSSTATE and another
Law: Pakistan Penal Code, 1860
Section: 302/337-A(ii)/337-A(i)/337-F(i)/148/149
Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860)-- ----Ss. 302 / 337-A(ii) / 337-A(i) / 337-F(vi)/337-F(i)/148/149--Conviction and sentence--Acquittal of co-accused--Difference in venue of occurrence--Belated recording of FIR--Conflict in between evidence of ocular account--Benefit of doubt--Venue of occurrence as per the contents and even examination of the witness is utterly in contradiction with the contents of scaled and un-scaled site-plan--Belated recording of the FIR would give rise to strong presumption that was drafted after due consultation and deliberations by assigning specific roles to the six accused persons including a woman accused with some ulterior motives and design--PW gave photographic narration of the injuries said to have been caused by each accused and same in ordinary course of nature was not possible--Possibility of narration of sequence of the incident given by complainant being tutored, cannot be ruled out--PW was discharged by the hospital but he did not move any application for registration of case--All three witnesses of ocular account seem to have concealed the facts and happenings--Evidence of witnesses of ocular account cannot be considered as trustworthy and confidence inspiring--Conflict in between evidence of ocular account and medical evidence in fact has caused a serious dent to the prosecution evidence--Motive part has already been disbelieved by the trial court--When ocular account as discussed in preceding paragraphs is not worthy of credit, reliance cannot be placed on recoveries which are only corroborative in natures are acquitted. [Pp. 1054, 1055, 1056, 1057, 1058 1059] A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, K L 2021 SCMR 873; 2015 SCMR 840 ref. Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860)-- ----Ss. 302/337-A(ii)/ 337-A(i)/ 337-F(vi)/ 337-F(i)/148/149--Acquittal of co-accused--Both the acquittal co-accused were attributed specific roles in the occurrence and evidence against them was same but trial court proceeded to acquit them--Such eye-witness could not be relied upon for the purpose of convicting another accused without independent corroboration.[P. 1058] I 2020 SCMR 319; 2015 SCMR 1142; 2008 SCMR 6 ref. Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492