Case Details

Citation(s)
2023 SLG 557 2023 SLD 557 2023 SCMR 487
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Jail Petition No. 355 of 2018, decision Dated: 2nd January, 2023. (On appeal against the judgment Dated 22.02.2018 passed by the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench in Criminal Appeal No. 481 of 2012). heard on: : 2nd January, 2023.
IJAZ UL AHSAN AND SAYYED MAZAHAR ALI AKBAR NAQVI, JJ
Ms. Sabahat Rizvi, Advocate Supreme Court (Via video link from Lahore) for Petitioners. Mirza Muhammad Usman, D.P.G. Punjab for the State. Abdul Khaliq Safrani, Advocate Supreme Court (Via video link from Lahore) for the Complainant.

MUHAMMAD ABBAS and another

VS

The STATE

Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 302(b),302(c)

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302(b), 302(c)--- Qatl-i-amd--- Reappraisal of evidence---Incident took place at 9:00 p.m. whereas the matter was reported to the police on the same night at 01:20 a.m. while the inter se distance between the place of occurrence and the Police Station was 25 kilometers---Such aspect of the case clearly reflected that the matter was reported to Police promptly without there being any delay---As the parties were related to each other, therefore, there was no chance of misidentification---Prosecution witnesses were subjected to lengthy cross-examination by the defence but nothing favourable to the accused persons or adverse to the prosecution could be produced on record---Said witnesses remained consistent on each and every material point, therefore, it could safely be concluded that the ocular account furnished by the prosecution was reliable, straightforward and confidence inspiring---Medical evidence available on the record was in line with the ocular account so far as the nature, locale, time and impact of the injuries on the person of the deceased was concerned---Counsel for the accused persons could not point out any reason as to why the complainant would falsely involve the accused persons in the present case and let off the real culprit---Substitution in such like cases was a rare phenomenon---Since the occurrence took place at the spur of the moment, conviction of accused persons under section 302(b), P.P.C. was converted into one under section 302(c), P.P.C.---Petition for leave to appeal was converted into appeal and partly allowed. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)--- Qatl-i-amd--- Prosecution witnesses related to the deceased---Mere relationship of the prosecution witnesses with the deceased cannot be a ground to discard the testimony of such witnesses. (c) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Minor discrepancies and contradictions in the statements of the eye-witnesses---Not significant---On account of lapse of memory owing to the intervening period, some minor discrepancies are inevitable and they may occur naturally---Accused cannot claim benefit of such minor discrepancies.…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492