Case Details

Citation(s)
2023 SLG 559 2023 SLD 559 2023 SCMR 501
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No. 600 of 2020, decision Dated: 26th January, 2023. (Against the order of Lahore High Court, Lahore Dated 04.02.2020 passed in W.P. No. 67 of 2020). heard on: : 26th January, 2023.
SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH AND AYESHA A. MALIK, JJ
Dr. G.M. Choudhary, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner. Nemo for
Respondents.

ATTIQ UR REHMAN

VS

Sh. TAHIR MEHMOOD and others

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 185(3)

Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 185(3)---Interim orders passed by the High Court---Interference in such orders by the Supreme Court---Scope and exception---Settled policy of the Supreme Court is not to readily interfere in the interim orders passed by the High Court---Desirable course of action is that the court hearing the case finally decides the same before it is brought before the Supreme Court as piecemeal adjudication is not desirable---Only exception is when the interim relief granted by the High Court is arbitrary or unreasonable or reflects abuse of power or wanton exercise of discretion resulting in miscarriage of justice. Muhammad Sadiq v. Bashir Ahmad PLD 1966 SC 717; Multan Development Authority v. Muhammad Ramzan PLD 1989 SC 629; Salah-Ud-Din v. Mst. Zia Farhat 1996 SCMR 1528 and Federation of Pakistan v. Shafiq Ul Hassan 2020 SCMR 2119 ref. ORDER SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH, J.---Respondent No.1 through a constitutional petition challenged the initiation of inquiry against him on the charges of which he already stood exonerated in three previous inquiries. He contended before the High Court that the Chief Minister’s Inspection Team has no authority to initiate the said inquiry against him. On…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492