| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2024 SLG 227 2024 SLD 227 2024 PTD 270 |
Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue
F.E.A. NO. 08/LB of 2018, decided on 20th November, 2023. Date of hearing: 14th November, 2023.
PRESENT: ZAHID SIKANDAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND MUHAMMAD TAHIR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Ikram ul Haq, ITP for Appellant. Muhammad Sarim Bhatti, DR for
Respondent.
F.E.A. NO. 08/LB of 2018, decided on 20th November, 2023. Date of hearing: 14th November, 2023.
PRESENT: ZAHID SIKANDAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND MUHAMMAD TAHIR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Ikram ul Haq, ITP for Appellant. Muhammad Sarim Bhatti, DR for
Respondent.
PETITIONER(S): MESSRS URBAN DEVELOPERS
VS
RESPONDENT(S): COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, RTO-II, LAHORE
Law: Income Tax Ordinance, 2001
Section: 221
Income Tax Ordinance (XLIX of 2001)---S.221---Rectification application---Maintainability---Matter sub-judice---Effect---While the Reference Application filed by the taxpayer (company/developers) was pending before the High Court, rectification application was moved by the taxpayer before the Assessing Officer purportedly on a new/different ground; previous order-in-original was rectified, yet not satisfied with the rectification done, appeal was filed whereby the Commissioner Appeals passed certain directions to the Officer Inland Revenue regarding rectification order---Taxpayer, still discontented, preferred appeal before the Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue (‘the Tribunal’)---Held, that both the Authorities had passed the orders in complete oblivion of law as once the Appellate Authority had decided the appeal, the order of the lower Authority would have merged into the appellate order---In the present case, not only the Commissioner (Appeals) but the Appellate Tribunal also had finalized the appeal against order-in-original by the Assessing officer and , admittedly, Reference Application was pending before the High Court against the order of the Appellate Tribunal---After exercising original jurisdiction, the Officer Inland Revenue became functuous officio with little window of rectification and that too could be against a mistake apparent and floating on the surface of such order---But after decision of the Appellate Forum, the order-in-original had merged into the order of the Appellate Authority and there remained no authority with the Officer Inland Revenue to rectify his own order---Present case was a clear example of capriciousness on the part of the Taxation Officer as despite the matter having been decided by the Appellate Forums and being pending before the High Court in continuation of the Assessment Order, the Officer Inland Revenue proceeded to rectify the very order-in-original---Further, in doing so, the Officer Inland Revenue had changed the same (order-in-original)---By rectifying order-in-original, the Officer Inland Revenue had nullified all the proceedings / orders having been conducted /passed by the Appellate Forums---Such proceedings…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492