Case Details

Citation(s)
2021 SLG 1343 2021 SLD 1343 2021 SCMR 673
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Appeals Nos. 240 and 272 of 2020, decided on 25th November, 2020, Date of hearing: 25th November, 2020. (Against the judgments Dated 06.09.2016 and 15.05.2018 passed in Writ Petition No. 382-A/2014 and Writ. Petition No. 1109-A/2016 of the Peshawar
IJAZ UL AHSAN, JUSTICE, MUNIB AKHTAR, JUSTICE
Shumail Ahmad Butt, A.G. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Atif Ali Khan, Ad AG, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Barrister Qasim Wadood, Ad A.G., Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Irum Shaheen, DD, HED, Asif Khan, Litigation Officer, HED, Amin Jan, AD, Fisheries, Gulzar Mahmood, AD Fisheries Kh

GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA THROUGH SECRETARY INDUSTRIES, COMMERCE AND TECHNICAL EDUCATION, MANPOWER TRAINING DEPARTMENT, PESHAWAR AND OTHErs

VS

SHAHZAD IQBAL AND OTHERS

Law: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Employees (Regularization of Services) Act, (XVI of 2009)

Section: 2(b),3

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Employees (Regularization of Services) Act (XVI of 2009)--- ----Ss. 2(b) 3---Project employees seeking regularization in service were appointed on contractual basis in Provincial Skill Development Centers by the Technology Up Gradation and Skill Development Company (TUSDEC), a fully owned subsidiary company of the Pakistan Industrial Development Cooperation (PIDC)---Subsequently, the project was handed over to the Provincial Government, which upon taking charge of the said project advertised various posts for making ad hoc appointments did not apply for the said advertised appointments and instead filed constitutional petitions before the High Court seeking regularization in service---Held, that where a project employee was recruited by a Company for a definite period of time, such an employee did not under any circumstances either directly or by implication become an employee of the provincial government---Cases of the respondents clearly fell outside the ambit of the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Employees (Regularization of Services) Act, 2009 (the 2009 Act) as they were all hired against project posts by TUSDEC and the project itself was to be executed by the Company under the control of the Federal Government for a requisite period of time before it was handed over to the Provincial Government---For the 2009 Act to apply, it was the Provincial Government that must employ the individual---Qualitative and conceptual difference existed between contract employees covered by the provisions of the 2009 Act and the temporary employees hired by TUSDEC during the time they operated the project before handing it over to the provincial government---Such employees could not by any stretch of the language be termed or treated as employees hired by the Provincial Government---In such circumstances, the benefit of the 2009 Act was not available to the respondents---Even otherwise, being project employees, the respondents were excluded from the benefits of the 2009 Act by virtue of S. 2(b)---High Court erred in law by concluding that the benefit of regularization was available to the respondents---Appeals were allowed and impugned of High Court was set-aside.…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492