Case Details

Citation(s)
2024 SLG 259 2024 SLD 259 2024 PTD 306
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petitions Nos.890-K to 909-K of 2023, decided on 22nd November, 2023. (Against the Order dated 14.03.2023 passed by High Court of Sindh, Karachi in C.Ps. Nos. 5389, 5245, 5004, 6120, 47, 361, 529, 530, 583, 5069, 5689, 6028, 7470, 7668, 7771 of 2021
PRESENT: IJAZ UL AHSAN, SYED HASAN AZHAR RIZVI AND IRFAN SAADAT KHAN, JJ
Dr. Farhat Zafar, Advocate Supreme Court (in all cases) along with Ms. Ume Kalsoom, D.C. Law East Karachi and Nabeel Siraj, D.C. Customs (both via video link, Karachi) for Petitioners. Nemo for
Respondents.

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND ANOTHER

VS

MESSRS YOUNG TECH PRIVATE LIMITED AND OTHERS

Law: Finance Act, 2018

Section: 10

Finance Act (XXX of 2018)-----S. 10 [as amended by the Finance Act (XIII of 2022)]---Mobile handset levy on imported phones---Levy on ordinary phones other than smart phones---Legality---Respondents had imported mobile phones and were aggrieved by the imposition of mobile handset levy under section 10 of the Finance Act, 2018 ("Act") on mobile phones that were admittedly not smart phones---Section 10 of the Act imposed mobile handset levy on smart phones supported by a table which gave categories of smart phones and the rates of levy per set---Subsequently in the Finance Act, 2022, the table of section 10 was amended and the amended table replaced the words "category of smart phone" with the words "Mobile Phones having C&F Value (US Dollars)"---Stance of the department was that by changing the table, it had been conferred the power to recover the said levy not only on the smart phones but also on the ordinary phone which did not fall in the category of smart phones---High Court came to the conclusion that without amending the charging section, i.e. section 10 and merely by amending the table, the levy could not be recovered---Validity---Right to recover any levy rests in the charging section and not in the table that specifies the rates at which such charge is to be recovered---Power to recover a levy is anchored in the charging section and the table is merely meant to prescribe the rates at which such levy is to be recovered on various goods/items---Unless the charging section confers a power to recover a levy on an article or class of goods, mere mention of a different class, types or category of goods clearly goes beyond the scope of the charging section---This cannot be done---Schedule/table is merely a supplement of the charging section and cannot go beyond it and create a new and altogether different levy on a different class of goods not mentioned or contemplated by the charging section---Impugned order of the High Court was in-line with settled principles of law on interpretation of fiscal statutes and tax laws---Petitions were dismissed and leave to appeal was refused. ORDER: IJAZ UL AHSAN, JUSTICE:---.--- Leave to appeal is sought against the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492