| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2023 SLG 949 2023 SLD 949 2023 PTD 576 |
Sindh High Court
C.P. No.D-4729 of 2021 along with 89 others petitions andthree High Court Appeals (As per Annexure A to thisjudgment) decided on 20th December, 2021. Dates of hearing:29th September, 8th, 15th, 22nd and 29th November, 2021.
MUHAMMAD SHAFI SIDDIQUI AND AGHA FAISAL, JJ
Hyder Ali Khan, along with Sami ur Rehman, Shaheer Roshan and Hamza Waheed, Ali Almani, Arshad Hussain, Naeem Suleman, Ovais Ali Shah along with Ms. Maryam Riaz, Abdul Rahim Lakhani, Abdul Jabbar Mallah, Attta Muhammad Qureshi, Ijaz Ahmed, M. Saleem Mangr
C.P. No.D-4729 of 2021 along with 89 others petitions andthree High Court Appeals (As per Annexure A to thisjudgment) decided on 20th December, 2021. Dates of hearing:29th September, 8th, 15th, 22nd and 29th November, 2021.
MUHAMMAD SHAFI SIDDIQUI AND AGHA FAISAL, JJ
Hyder Ali Khan, along with Sami ur Rehman, Shaheer Roshan and Hamza Waheed, Ali Almani, Arshad Hussain, Naeem Suleman, Ovais Ali Shah along with Ms. Maryam Riaz, Abdul Rahim Lakhani, Abdul Jabbar Mallah, Attta Muhammad Qureshi, Ijaz Ahmed, M. Saleem Mangr
WAZIR ALI INDUSTRIES LTD.
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS
Law: Sales Tax Act, 1990
Section: 25,25(1),25(2),72B
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199
Law: Federal Excise Act, 2005
Section: 46
(a) Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)------S.25(1)---Access to record and documents---Pre-conditions---Phrase "as an when required"--- Scope---Event or stage when said phrase may come into play and is given some meaning is when a Commissioner examines return of a tax payer, he may have some queries which might be tempting to call record as he may not be able to reconcile and/or resolve them through return statement---Such queries must be understood and settled to the satisfaction of the Commissioner before he can make up his mind further---Audit is nowhere in the scheme when such questions come for consideration after going through the returns while the Commissioner acts under 25(1) of Sales Tax Act, 1990--- Record may satisfy curious mind but queries must be genuine at the time of calling the record which could not have been answered without going through the record required--- Record calling cannot be a roving exercise and cannot be a courtesy call either. (b) Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)------S.25(1)---Access to record and documents---Commissioner, jurisdiction of---Scope---Requirements of S.25(1) of Sales Tax Act, 1990, are neither unfettered nor are so liberal that a hunting expedition would commence---There has to be an event or occasion when Commissioner requires record and documents maintained under Sales Tax Act, 1990, or any other Act--- Even requiring documents/record for satisfaction of queries must be revealed so that notice may not transform into a hunt. PLD 2019 Sindh 144 and 8 N.J. Misc. 418 (1930) rel. (c) Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990)----S.25(2)---Access to record and documents--- Phrase "on the basis of the record , obtained under subsection (1)"---Applicability---Phrase applies to Commissioner's act of authorizing officer to conduct audit, i.e., selecting taxpayer for an audit, and not officer's act of conducting audit itself--- Provision of S.25(2) of Sales Tax Act, 1990, does not concern the manner in which audit is to be conducted but specifically concerns selection of a person for an audit, inquiry or investigation. Dewan Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Federation of Pakistan and others Suit 850/2020 and others and Pakistan Tobacco Co. Ltd. v. Federation of…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492