Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Section: 1,2,

Law: Specific Relief Act, 1877

Section: 12,39,42,54

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O.XIII, Rr. 1, 2, O. XVI, Rr. 1 2---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 12, 39, 42 54--- Additional documents, production of--- Principle--- Concurrent findings of facts by two Courts below--- In suit for specific performance of agreement, cancellation of documents, declaration and injunction, plaintiffs/petitioners sought filing of some additional documents but the application was dismissed concurrently by Trial Court as well as Lower Appellate Court--- Plea raised by plaintiffs/petitioners was that earlier the documents were not in their possession--- Validity--- All documents relied upon, were to be produced under O.XIII, R.1, C.P.C., at the time of first hearing along with plaint--- Object was to prevent possibility of producing suspicious or forged documents by parties at later stage of proceedings--- Parties were required to produce their documents at the earlier stage so that opposite parties should know what documents were being relied upon--- High Court declined to exercise discretion in favour of plaintiffs/petitioners to permit them to produce documents, as their plea regarding possession of documents was not based on sound or cogent reasons--- Plaintiffs/petitioners were to satisfy Courts below to exercise discretion in their favour and did not give reference of the documents in their plaint nor any of the witness and attorney stated anything about the documents--- Courts below concurrently refused to exercise their discretion in favour of plaintiff/petitioners, who failed to point out any illegality or irregularity in orders--- High Court in exercise of extraordinary Constitutional jurisdiction declined to interfere in the orders passed by two Courts below which were well reasoned and according to law--- Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances. Muhammad Ijaz Ahmed Chaudhary v. Mumtaz Ahmed Tarar 2016 SCMR 1; 2018 CLC 1334 and Sher Baz Khan v. Malkani Sahibzadi Tiwana PLD 2003 SC 849 ref. Allah Bakhsh v. Fathe Bibi 1994 SCMR 1945 and Muhammad Umar Mirza v. Waris Iqbal 1990 SCMR 964 rel. JUDGMENT ABDUL HAMEED BALOCH, JUSTICE.---- Through this common judgment we intend to dispose of the above…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492