Case Details

Citation(s)
2024 SLG 2953 2024 SLD 2953 2024 SLD 978
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Misc. Application No. 6336 of 2023 in Civil Review Petition No. 272 of 2022, decided on 3rd November, 2023. Civil Misc. Application no. 6336 of 2023 (for restoration of CRP which was dismissed for non-prosecution on 27.04.2023 by this court) In Civi
PRESENT: QAZI FAEZ ISA, C.J., AMIN-UD-DIN KHAN AND ATHAR MINALLAH, JJ
Malik Saleem Iqbal Awan, Advocate Supreme Court along with Ghulam Sajjad Khan, P. No. 9(b) for Applicants. Nemo for
Respondents.

MUHAMMAD MUMTAZ KHAN (DECEASED) THROUGH L.RS. AND OTHERS---APPLICANTS

VS

MST. SIRAJ BIBI (DECEASED) THROUGH L.RS. AND OTHERS---RESPONDENTS

Law: Contract, Act, 1872

Section: 215

Law: Specific Relief Act, 1877

Section: 39,42

Law: Land Revenue Act, 1967 (XVII of 1967)

Section: 42

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 24(1),188

Contract Act (IX of 1872)--- ----S. 215---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 39 & 42---Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), S. 42---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 24(1) & 188---Review petition---Suit for declaration and cancellation of sale mutations---Attorney misusing the power-of-attorney to sell land---Depriving a female/woman of her immoveable property---Extra care to be exercised by Courts---Power-of-attorney was executed in favour of F (attorney) by his sister (predecessor of the respondents) which was used by F to purportedly sell 109 kanals of land to his four sons---Power-of-attorney did not specifically authorize the sale of the land in favour of the attorney or his sons, and F had misused it---Sister repudiated the sale transactions and filed a suit for declaration and cancellation---Suit was decreed and the decision of the Trial Court was upheld throughout---Validity---Conduct of the attorney, F , and his four sons, the purported buyers, was deplorable and reprehensible as a sister and aunt was illegally deprived of her land---Often vulnerable members of society are exploited and deprived of their properties by such dubious methods, and then they spend a lifetime to regain what is rightfully theirs---Sister was entangled in a web of perpetual litigation, and, even though all the decisions were in her favour, she remained deprived of the land and its produce throughout her lifetime--- F and his sons violated Article 24(1) of the Constitution, which guarantees that no person shall be deprived of his property save in accordance with law---Purported sale/transfer of the subject land was effected in derogation of section 42 of the Land Revenue Act, 1967, and of the judgments of the Supreme Court which stipulate that extra care must be exercised with regard to the property of women---Revenue officers/officials were either complicit in recording the illegal mutations or were incompetent---Review petition was dismissed with the directions that the petitioners shall immediately hand over the possession of the subject land to the respondents (legal heirs of the sister), and if they do not do so the concerned revenue authorities should immediately…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492