Case Details

Citation(s)
2022 SLG 3286 2022 SLD 3286
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Jail Petition No. 95 of 2017, decision dated: 14-03-2022, date of hearing: 14-03-2022. (On appeal against the judgment dated 15.12.2016 passed by the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench in Criminal Appeal No. 319 of 2014)
SARDAR TARIQ MASOOD, JUSTICE, SAYYED MAZAHAR ALI AKBAR NAQVI, JUSTICE, JAMAL KHAN MANDOKHAIL, JUSTICE
Sardar Muhammad Latif Khan Khosa, Senior Advocate Supreme Court, Syed Iqbal Hussain Shah, Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Muhammad Jaffer, Additional P. G. Punjab for the State.

PETITIONER(S): FAISAL SHAHZAD

VS

RESPONDENT(S): THE STATE

Law: Control of Narcotics Substances Act, 1997

Section: 9(c),77

(a) Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997)--- ----S. 9(c)---Possession of 10 kilograms of charas and 5 kilograms of opium---Reappraisal of evidence---Case was lodged with promptitude on the basis of spy information, which was supplied to the law enforcing agency prior to conducting raid by the raiding party comprising of number of police officials and it had already established a picket at the particular place on the basis of the said information---Accused was caught red handed in broad daylight by the police and a huge quantity of contraband charas and opium was recovered from him, which was contained in a sack/gatoo in fifteen separate packets---Police officials separated 10 grams of charas and 10 grams of opium from each packet in the prescribed manner and put the samples in 15 separate packets and then sent the same to the office of Chemical Examiner for its analysis---Safe chain of custody of the recovered narcotics was not compromised at all---Reports of the Chemical Examiner showed that all the 15 packets contained contraband charas and opium---Prosecution case hinges upon the statements of police officials, who narrated the prosecution story in a natural manner and remained consistent throughout and their testimony despite lengthy cross-examination---Said witnesses had no enmity with the accused to falsely implicate him in the present case---Even otherwise a huge quantity of contrabands could not be planted by the Investigating Officer of its own---Petition for leave to appeal was dismissed, leave was refused, and conviction and sentence of accused was maintained. (b) Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997)--- ----S. 9(c)---Narcotic cases---Testimony of police officials, reliance upon---Scope---Testimony of police officials is as good as any other private witness unless it is proved that they have animus against the accused---Reluctance of general public to become witness in such like cases has become judicially recognized fact and there is no impediment to consider statement of official witnesses, as no legal bar or restriction has been imposed in such regard---Police officials are as good witnesses and can be relied upon, if their…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492