Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 302,109,34

Law: Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance, 1979

Section: 17

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302, 109 34---Offences Against Property (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), S. 17---Qatl-i-amd, abetment, common intention, haraabah---Appreciation of evidence---Sentence, reduction in--- Ocular account---Scope---Accused were charged for snatching mobile phones, gold ornaments and cash from the house of the complainant, on resistance, one of the accused fired with pistol, which hit the brother of complainant who died---Ocular account of the prosecution case hinged upon deposition of four prosecution witnesses---Complainant, real brother of deceased while corroborating the contents of the FIR stated the whole story of the case---Evidence of complainant, in lengthy protracted cross-examination, had not been shaken by the defence---Eye-witness had fully supported the complainant---Said witness was also subjected to lengthy cross-examination but no specific or notable contradiction had brought by the defence in their favour---Third eye-witness of the prosecution while deposing similar facts of the occurrence identified the accused persons present in court to be the same who committed house trespass in their dwelling and committed qatl of deceased and looted the property from their house---Said witness was also cross-examined at length, spreading on eight pages but no specific contradiction had brought on record by the defence---Record showed that it had become amply clear that the accused persons in furtherance of their common intention trespassed forcibly in the house of deceased and in furtherance of their intention, one of the accused fired pistol shot at brother of complainant, who died---Presence of remaining three accused in the dwelling of complainant had also been established from the evidence and identification parade was held before the Civil Judge, hence all accused persons were liable for the offence committed by them jointly---Presence of the accused at the time of occurrence with firearm weapon had not been specifically denied and they were identified by the eye-witnesses, therefore, all accused were responsible for the act committed by any of them---Circumstances established that the prosecution had…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492