Case Details

Citation(s)
2023 SLG 2381 2023 SLD 2381 2023 PCRLJ 1787
Sindh Chief Court
Criminal Acquittal Appeal No. S-51 of 2020, decided on 23rd September, 2020.Date of hearing: 16th September, 2020.
Before Khadim Hussain M. Shaikh, J
Mirza Muhammad Salman for Appellant.
Respondents Nos.1, 3, 4, 5 and 6 present in person. Nemo for
Respondent No. 2. Syed Zahoor Ahmed Shah, Deputy Prosecutor General, Sindh for the State/
Respondent No. 8.

Mst. SUNILA MUSHTAQ---Appellant

VS

BABAR HUSSAIN and 7 others---Respondents

Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 50692),509

Law: Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act, 2013

Section: 5(f),5(j),5(k)

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 506(2) & 509---Domestic Violence (Prevention and Protection) Act (XX of 2013), Ss. 5(f), 5(j) & 5(k)---Criminal intimidation, harassment at work place---Appreciation of evidence---Appeal against acquittal---Prosecution case was that the accused-respondents, close relative of complainant, misbehaved with her and used filthy language and extended threats of dire consequences to her and tried to turn out her from the house along with her children and they were continuously harassing, pressurizing and torturing her by physical violence through different means---Record showed that neither date, time and place of any specific incident was shown by the complainant in her complaint nor had she mentioned name of any person to be the witness of the threats allegedly issued by the accused persons to her---Even date of alleged dispossession of the complainant from the house in question was not shown in the direct complaint---Complainant had stated that her sister-in-law entered in her house along with her articles to which complainant asked her that how she entered in the house without permission---Said sister-in-law of complainant became angry and used filthy language against the complainant and her husband and brother-in-law and sister-in-law---Said sister-in-law of complainant also misbehaved with her---Complainant deposed that accused issued threats to her that she would kill her, however, other witness did not depose a single word regarding issuing of threats of killing to complainant by accused---Said witness deposed that she and her husband were living with complainant jointly and they were evicted from the house---Complainant deposed that witness and her husband were not living with her in the house---Although complainant claimed to have been caused physical violence to her by the accused persons by maltreating her, but she had neither produced any evidence to show that she had received any injury nor did she produced any medical certificate---Said material discrepancies and infirmities in the prosecution case rendered the same doubtful---Circumstances showed that the matter was purely of civil nature but the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492