Case Details

Citation(s)
2022 SLG 685 2022 SLD 685 2022 PCRLJ 314
Lahore High Court, Bahawalpur Bench, Bahalwalpur
Criminal Appeal No. 624-J and Murder Reference No. 81 of 2016, heard on 9th February, 2021. Date of hearing: 9th February, 2021.
SARDAR AHMED NAEEM, JUSTICE, MUHAMMAD WAHEED KHAN, JUSTICE
Farooq Haider Malik for Appellant. Najeeb Ullah Jatoi, Deputy Prosecutor General for the State. Rao Nasir Mehmood Khan for the Complainant.

MUHAMMAD ASLAM

VS

THE STATE

Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 302(b)

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)--- Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Accused was charged for committing murder of his wife by inflicting hatchet blows---Motive behind the incident was stated to be that the deceased had a Jhoti (young buffalo) and the accused wanted to sell that which resulted into altercation between the spouses---Record showed that the occurrence took place at 04:00 a.m.---No source of light was mentioned by the witnesses at the crime scene---Occurrence took place in the residential room of the house situated at the Dera---Evidence and the scaled site plan showed that the deceased after sustaining injuries fell on a cot lying in the said room but no cot was taken into possession during the investigation---Material available on record further suggested that the complainant was living at a distance of 4/5 acre from the place of occurrence with his family in a nearby Basti having about 100 houses---Accused was also chased by her family members---Family of a witness also came to the crime scene and witnessed the occurrence admitted by the complainant, but none from their families was cited as witness---Accused got married to the deceased 15/16 years ago and had three sons aged about 15 years, 12 years and 10 years respectively---Sons of the accused except elder were present inside the room but they were also not examined at the crime scene---Evidence showed that the place of occurrence i.e. the room had no outlet/window, thus, it appeared to be improbable that the accused could manage his escape, in particular, leaving behind the hatchet in presence of so many family members/relatives of the deceased---Statement of eye-witness was at variance with that of the complainant which reflected that he had witnessed the occurrence along with the children standing outside the room---Said witness had also admitted that they made no effort to shut the door or bolt the same from outside---Circumstances established that the prosecution had failed to prove its case against the accused beyond reasonable shadow of doubt--- Appeal against conviction was allowed, in circumstances. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S.…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492