Case Details

Citation(s)
2024 SLG 299 2024 SLD 299 2024 CLD 383
Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan
M.As. Nos. 45(14)def/ABR and 45-1(14)def/ABR of 2023, decision dated: 25th August, 2023.Date of hearing: 22nd June, 2023.
Before Akif Saeed, Chairman/Commissioner and Abdul Rehman Warraich, Commissioner
Barrister Shahzad Javed Panni for Applicant (Jamhex Company (Private) Limited) (in M.A. No. 45(14)def/ABR of 2023). Barrister Usman Mughal for Applicant (Nitrokitnya) (in M.A. No.45-1(14)def/ABR of 2023). Raja Farukh Ahmad (Additional Joint Registrar),

Messrs JAMHEX COMPANY (PRIVATE) LIMITED and another---Applicants

VS

APPELLATE BENCH REGISTRY---Respondent

Law: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act, (XLII of 1997)

Section: 40-A,33

Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan Act (XLII of 1997)--- ----Ss. 40-A & 33---Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan (Appellate Bench Procedure) Rules 2003, R. 8---Audi altrem partem, principle of---Proper and necessary party, non-impleading of---Scope---A party, to the proceedings culminating in an order-in-original, was not impleaded by the appellant while preferring appeal to the Appellate Forum; deficiency letter was issued by the Appellate Bench Registry to the appellant directing to implead said party as respondent being necessary party---Objection application was moved by the appellant assailing said directions/letter contenting that grievances of the party/ respondent had already been addressed through order-in-original---Validity---Principle of audi altrem partem meaning that "hear the other side" or " let the other side be heard " is a fundamental tenet of the procedural fairness ensuring that individuals be given fair opportunity to present their case, challenge evidence and respond to the arguments; it upholds the principles of justice, due process, and the protection of individual's rights---In the present case denying to implead respondent as a necessary party to the appeal would undermine the principle of dispensing justice---Furthermore, to avoid multiplicity and delay of proceedings respondent shall be impleaded as a party to the appeal---Respondent earlier remained part of the proceedings and to ensure the continuity of the proceedings warranted to make the same as a party to the appeal---If the decision of the appeal filed by the applicant was made without hearing respondent then rights of the later shall be infringed---Therefore, respondent was a necessary party to the appeal in the light of the said facts and principles---Appellate Bench directed the Applicant to implead respondent as a party in its appeal and to file amended memorandum of appeal within fifteen days, failing with which, appeal would not be registered---Bench further directed the respondent that upon submission of amended documents by the applicant/appellant and satisfaction of the respondents thereof, appeal of the Applicant against the…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492