Case Details

Citation(s)
2022 SLG 3007 2022 SLD 3007 2022 YLR 721

Criminal Appeal No. 520-J of 2018 and Murder Reference No.86 of 2017, heard on 30th March, 2021. Date of hearing:30th March, 2021.
RAJA SHAHID MAHMOOD ABBASI AND SADIQ MAHMUD KHURRAM, JJ
Muhammad Usman Sharif Khosa, for Appellant. Muhammad Ali Shahab, Deputy Prosecutor General for the State.

HAQ NAWAZvsThe STATE

Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 302(b)

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Sentence, reduction in---Presence of the eye-witnesses at the spot was justifiable---Scope---Accused was charged for committing murder of the brother of the complainant by firing---Motive behind the occurrence was that deceased forbade the accused from his house and due to that grudge accused committed the murder of the deceased---Ocular account of the incident had been furnished by brother and paternal cousin of the deceased being eye-witnesses---Admittedly, the accused was married to the sister of the deceased since the last 8/9 years prior to the occurrence---Both the eye-witnesses explained their presence at the place of occurrence categorically---Said witnesses in a very natural and forthright manner narrated the incidence and gave each and every detail of the same---Occurrence took place inside the agricultural land belonging to brother of deceased and at about 02.30 p.m., the presence of deceased and eye-witnesses at that time, inside their own agricultural land, just in front of their houses, could not be doubted and was, but natural---Both the witnesses explained their arrival at the place of occurrence and also the reason for their presence there---Similarly, eye-witness also explained that his house was adjacent to the house of complainant and he along with the witnesses and the deceased were working at the place of occurrence before the arrival of the accused---Site plans of the place of occurrence revealed that the presence of the witnesses had been clearly marked in the same and it had been mentioned in the same that the occurrence took place in the land belonging to deceased---Perusal of the said site plan of the place of occurrence further revealed that the land cultivated by eye-witness had also been marked in the same, whereas the house of the complainant and the deceased had also been clearly identified---Such evidence proved that not only both the witnesses were present at the place of occurrence at the time of occurrence but they had also witnessed the occurrence which had taken place inside their own cultivated land---No friction between the accused and…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492