| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2023 SLG 1389 2023 SLD 1389 2023 SCMR 975 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Petition No. 13-K of 2023, decided on 22nd March, 2023. Date of hearing: 22nd March, 2023. (Against the order Dated 04.01.2023 passed by the High Court of Sindh at Karachi in Criminal Bail Application No. 1548 of 2022)
Present: Munib Akhtar and Muhammad Ali Mazhar, JJ
Abdul Khursheed Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Mazhar Ali B. Chohan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Hussain Bux Baloch, Additional P.G. for the State.
Criminal Petition No. 13-K of 2023, decided on 22nd March, 2023. Date of hearing: 22nd March, 2023. (Against the order Dated 04.01.2023 passed by the High Court of Sindh at Karachi in Criminal Bail Application No. 1548 of 2022)
Present: Munib Akhtar and Muhammad Ali Mazhar, JJ
Abdul Khursheed Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Mazhar Ali B. Chohan, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Hussain Bux Baloch, Additional P.G. for the State.
AHTISHAM ALI---Petitioner
VERSUS
The STATE-----Respondent
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 498
Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section: 324,380,427,337-A(i),337-F(i),34
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 185(3)
(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 498---Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 324, 380, 427, 337-A(i), 337-F(i), 34---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 185(3)---Attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, theft, illegal possession of property---Pre-arrest bail, refusal of---First Information Report was lodged by father (complainant) against his son, who forcibly tried to dispossess his father from his house---Version of the eye-witnesses fully supported the medical evidence and version of the complainant---Serious allegations were also made against the accused persons of devising and designing a false agreement to sell regarding the subject house with the sole intention of committing fraud and cheating the complainant and also misappropriating household items and the original file of the house---Offences under section 324, 380, P.P.C. were both non-bailable---No specific details of any mala fide intention or ulterior motives had been alleged by the accused to explain why his father had set the law into motion against his own sons---Accused had also failed to demonstrate that his father wanted his arrest for some ulterior motives or to cause him any humiliation or to disgrace him in the public at large---Petition for leave to appeal was dismissed, leave was declined, and accused was refused pre-arrest bail. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 34---Common intention---Scope---In order to constitute an offence under section 34, P.P.C., it is not required that a person should necessarily perform any act by his own hand, rather the common intention presupposes prior concert and requires a pre-arranged plan---If several persons have the common intention of doing a particular criminal act and if, in furtherance of their common intention, all of them join together and aid or abet each other in the commission of an act, then the one who has not actually done the act with his hands, but helps by his presence or by other act in the commission of the main act, he would be held to have himself done that act within the meaning of section 34, P.P.C. (c) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----Ss. 498, 497(2)---Pre-arrest bail---Scope and grounds---Grant of pre-arrest bail is an…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492