| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2022 SLG 1513 2022 SLD 1513 2022 PLJ 98 |
Lahore High Court
C.R. No. 54824 of 2020, decided on 9.9.2021.
MUHAMMAD SAJID MEHMOOD SETHI, J.
Mrs. Naila Mushtaq Ahmad Dhoon, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. M. Mumtaz Faridi, Advocate for
Respondent.
C.R. No. 54824 of 2020, decided on 9.9.2021.
MUHAMMAD SAJID MEHMOOD SETHI, J.
Mrs. Naila Mushtaq Ahmad Dhoon, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. M. Mumtaz Faridi, Advocate for
Respondent.
NASRULLAH BHALLI
VS
MUHAMMAD NAWAZ---Respondent
Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Section: 115
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908)-- ----S. 115--Return of barrowed amount--Imposing of condition for submission of bank guarantee--Surety bond was already submitted by petitioner has raised a plea regarding return of borrowed amount in presence of witnesses--Condition imposed by trial Court, is harsh and tantamounts to negate principle of law, same is untenable--Revision petition allowed. 2007 CLD 267 ref. ORDER Through instant revision petition, petitioner has assailed order dated 10.09.2020, passed by learned Additional District Judge, Sialkot, whereby petitioner was granted leave to appear and contest the suit subject to submission of bank guarantee of an amount ofRs. 55,00,000/-. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that pursuant to the interim order dated 28.10.2020, passed by this Court, surety bond equivalent to the claimed amount has already been submitted. She adds that learned trial Court is proceeding with the case and evidence is being recorded, therefore, condition for submission of bank guarantee is harsh. When confronted, learned counsel for respondent could not controvert the above…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492