| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2022 SLG 3030 2022 SLD 3030 2022 YLR 885 |
Balochistan High Court
Criminal Appeal No. 281 and Criminal Revision Petition No. 30 of 2019, decided on 23rd December, 2019*. Date of hearing: 19th November, 2019.
MUHAMMAD HASHIM KHAN KAKAR AND ROZI KHAN BARRECH, JJ
Gulzar Khan Kakar and Kaleemullah Kakar for Appellants (in Criminal Appeal No.281 of 2019). Bangul Khan Mari for the Complainant (in Criminal Appeal No.281 of 2019). Habibullah Gul, Additional Prosecutor General (APG) for the State (in Criminal Appeal No.
Criminal Appeal No. 281 and Criminal Revision Petition No. 30 of 2019, decided on 23rd December, 2019*. Date of hearing: 19th November, 2019.
MUHAMMAD HASHIM KHAN KAKAR AND ROZI KHAN BARRECH, JJ
Gulzar Khan Kakar and Kaleemullah Kakar for Appellants (in Criminal Appeal No.281 of 2019). Bangul Khan Mari for the Complainant (in Criminal Appeal No.281 of 2019). Habibullah Gul, Additional Prosecutor General (APG) for the State (in Criminal Appeal No.
and others
VS
The STATE through Prosecutor General Balochistan and others
Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section: 302,324,34
(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302, 324 34---Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Delay of one hour and fifteen minutes in lodging the FIR---Scope---Accused were charged that they made firing upon the father and brother of the complainant, due to which both were injured but brother of complainant succumbed to injuries---Record showed that the alleged occurrence had taken place at 5:15 p.m. and the FIR was lodged at 6:30 p.m.---Complainant and a witness shifted the dead body of deceased and injured to the hospital and thereafter the complainant lodged the report---Circumstances established that FIR was lodged promptly without any delay. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302, 324 34---Qatl-i-amd, attempt to commit qatl-i-amd, common intention---Appreciation of evidence---Ocular account supported by medical evidence---Effect---Accused persons were charged that they made firing upon the father and brother of the complainant, due to which both were injured but brother of complainant succumbed to injuries---Ocular account of the incident had been furnished by complainant, injured and a witness---Injured being eye witness narrated the whole story with regard to the occurrence---Said witness had correctly stated the date, time, the place of occurrence and the manner in which the alleged occurrence had taken place---Likewise, another eyewitness, relative of the deceased, fully corroborated the contents of the FIR as well as statement of injured witness---All the said witnesses gave consistent, natural and straightforward ocular account of the occurrence---Defence subjected them to a lengthy searching cross-examination but their testimony remained unshaken and un-shattered---Nothing was in their cross-examination to show that the accused were falsely implicated in the case---First Information Report was lodged promptly without any delay while the Investigating Officer had recorded the statements of both the witnesses soon after the occurrence---Presence of father of deceased was further established at the place of occurrence as he had also received injuries on his person---Presence of said witnesses at the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492