| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2022 SLG 3032 2022 SLD 3032 2022 YLR 901 |
Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, Rawalpindi
Criminal Appeal No. 25 of 2018 and Murder Reference No. 79 of 2019, heard on 20th May, 2021. Date of hearing: 20th May, 2021.
CH. ABDUL AZIZ AND MUHAMMAD WAHEED KHAN, JJ
Imran Khan Abbasi for Appellant. Nemo for Complainant. Naveed Ahmed Warriach, Deputy District Public Prosecutor for the State.
Criminal Appeal No. 25 of 2018 and Murder Reference No. 79 of 2019, heard on 20th May, 2021. Date of hearing: 20th May, 2021.
CH. ABDUL AZIZ AND MUHAMMAD WAHEED KHAN, JJ
Imran Khan Abbasi for Appellant. Nemo for Complainant. Naveed Ahmed Warriach, Deputy District Public Prosecutor for the State.
Raja FAHAD
VS
The STATE and another
Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section: 302(b)
Law: Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)
Section: 164
(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Sentence, reduction in---Accused was charged for committing murder of the brother of complainant by inflicting churri blows---Ocular account of the incident had been furnished by brother and cousin of the deceased---Statements of said two witnesses were found to be in unison on material aspects of the case regarding mode, manner of occurrence and the role allegedly played by the accused---Both the witnesses were cross-examined by the defence but no serious effort was made to challenge their availability at the crime scene and rebut their evidence---Defence had only put bald suggestions to them without putting any solid material to dislodge their claim qua the culpability of the accused---In the present case, on perusal of FIR, statement of eye-witnesses and the other facts and circumstances available on record showed that there was no background of ill-will or bitterness between the accused and the deceased---Incident in issue had erupted all of a sudden without pre-meditation and the accused allegedly caused fatal knife (Churri) injuries to the deceased due to a sudden quarrel between them---At the same time nothing was available on record, which could suggest that the accused had taken undue advantage or acted in cruel or unusual manner---Circumstances established that the prosecution had proved its case against the accused beyond shadow of reasonable doubt---Facts and circumstances of the case suggested that accused was liable to be convicted and punished under S.302(c), P.P.C., instead of S.302(b), P.P.C.---Resultantly, death sentence was converted into imprisonment for fourteen years, in circumstances---Appeal against conviction was dismissed with said modification in sentence. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 164--- Qatl-i-amd---Appreciation of evidence---Sentence, reduction in---Collection of evidence through modern device---Scope---Accused was charged for committing murder of the brother of complainant by inflicting churri blows---In the present case, most important evidence, which had paramount importance, was…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492