Case Details

Citation(s)
2023 SLG 2412 2023 SLD 2412 2023 PLJ 32`
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Crl. A. No. 633 of 2019, decided on 7.6.2023. (Against thejudgment of the High Court of Balochistan, Quetta, dated06.11.2019 passed in C.P. No. 141 of 2016)Date of hearing:7.6.2023.
Present: SYED MANSOOR ALI SHAH, SYED HASAN AZHAR RIZVI AND
Mr. Amanullah Kanrani, ASC and Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, AOR for Appellant. Malik Javed Iqbal Wains, Addl. AGP. Mr. M. Ayaz Khan Swati, Addl. AG, Balochistan and Mr. Kamran Murtaza, ASC for
Respondents.

SHAHID WAHEED, JJ. SULTAN AHMED--Appellant

VERSUS

REGISTRAR, BALOCHISTAN HIGH COURT, QUETTA and others--Respondents

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 10,175,203,204

Constitution of Pakistan, 1973-- ----Arts. 10, 175, 203 & 204--Suo motu contempt proceeding--Contempt of Couort--Unqualified apology--District judiciary--Public confidence--Passed in a suo motu contempt proceeding--The High Court has, by the said order, convicted the appellant under the Contempt of Court Ordinance 2003 and sentenced him to imprisonment till rising of the court with a fine of Rs. 5000/--Appellant raided the official residence of the Qazi, assaulted and arrested him, on the allegation of his having illicit relations with “Z” a police constable, whose civil suit for correction of the date of her birth was pending adjudication in the Court of the Qazi--Mst. “M” was also recovered from the house of the Qazi at that time--The Qazi was kept confined there for about 6 hours without registration of any criminal case against him--Incident was reported by the District & Sessions Judge, on 17 February, to the Registrar--Commission, after making thorough inquiry into the facts, submitted its detailed report on 2 May 2016--On this report of the Commission, the Division Bench issued notices to the appellant and awarded a lesser punishment--When the accused offers an unqualified apology at an early stage of the contempt proceeding as a sincere and profound remorse, the courts generally drop such proceeding and discharge the accused while warning him to be careful in the future--This is not an absolute rule to be followed invariably in all cases. The exceptional facts and circumstances of a case may justify departure from this general rule--Power to supervise and control vested in the High Courts under Article 203 of the Constitution--Legislature has conferred upon the High Courts the power to punish a contempt committed in relation to any court of the district judiciary--Balochistan High Court has performed its constitutional duty of protecting the independence of the judiciary by safeguarding the sanctity and prestige of the judges of district judiciary-our bastions of justice and an integral part of the judiciary envisaged under Article 175 of the Constitution--Law of contempt protects the courts and judges, protection of the public interest and more…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492