Case Details

Citation(s)
2020 SLG 781 2020 SLD 781 2020 PCRLJ 556
Sindh High Court
Criminal Accountability Appeals Nos. 15 and 16 of 2001,decision Dated: 06-02-2019, hearing Date : 03-12-2018
MOHAMMED KARIM KHAN AGHA, JUSTICE OMAR SIAL, JUSTICE
Haq Nawaz Talpur and Mohammad Asad Ashfaque for Appellant (in Criminal Accountability Appeal No. 15 of 2001).K.A. Vaswani and R.D. Kalhoro, Special Prosecutor, NAB for the State.

ABDUL WAHAB AND ANOTHERVSTHE STATE

Law:

Section:

(a) Judgment--- ----Per incuriam---Scope---"Per incuriam" in essence meant that in context of s/orders of court that such s/orders were patently wrong as they were passed in ignorance of law which most often was not brought to attention of court before it passed order/ in question---Contrary to a binding order/ of a superior court on same point which was decided before courts s/orders and which was not brought to its attention---Likewise, a statute which already answered legal point which was subject matter of /order but which was not brought to attention of court before it made its /order which lead to /order being wrong as a matter of law. (b) Interpretation of statutes--- ----Role of judiciary---Scope---Role of judiciary of interpretation of statute only arises when statute is to a certain extent either unclear or ambiguous or prima facie in violation of the Constitution---In such cases, it is for judiciary to interpret that piece of legislation by trying to ascertain intent of Parliament in passing legislation---Courts have absolutely no authority or power to substitute their views for those intended by legislature simply because they may disapprove of a particular law and way in which that law is being applied. (c) National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999)--- ----Ss. 9(a)(iii), 16A, 18 & 32--- Appeal--- Preliminary objection---Jurisdiction--- Determination--- Transfer of case and filing of reference---Cases in which accused persons were convicted and sentenced to imprisonment by Accountability Court were transferred from ordinary criminal courts---Plea raised by accused persons was that Accountability Court had no jurisdiction to try their cases as proper procedure was not followed after transfer---Validity---Accountability Court under S. 18(a) of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, could not take cognizance of an offence unless a reference was filed by Chairman National Accountability Bureau (NAB)---Such was only applied to investigations carried out by NAB under S. 18 of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, and not transferred cases under S. 16(A) of National Accountability Ordinance, 1999---Provision of S. 16(A) of National…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492