| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2023 SLG 1327 2023 SLD 1327 2023 CLD 387 |
Islamabad High Court
Writ Petitions No. 1422 and 2579 of 2019, decided on 21st October, 2022.
MOHSIN AKHTAR KAYANI, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Writ Petitions No. 1422 and 2579 of 2019, decided on 21st October, 2022.
MOHSIN AKHTAR KAYANI, J
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
AIR BLUE (PVT.) LIMITED through M.D. and others
VS
JUDGE CONSUMER COURT (WEST), ISLAMABAD and others
Law: Islamabad Consumers Protection Act, 1995
Section: 2(c)(e)
Law: Carriage By Air Act, 2012
Section: 4,33,34
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199
Islamabad Consumer Protection Act (II of 1995)--- ----S. 2(c) (e)---Carriage by Air Act (IV of 2012), Ss. 4, 33 34---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitutional petition---Consumer rights---Travel by air---Liability of airline---Forum of adjudication---Petitioner/Airline was aggrieved of proceedings initiated under Islamabad Consumer Protection Act, 1995, for imposing damages upon it for loss of baggage of respondent/passenger---Validity---Manner of determining liability of a carrier and quantum whereof were matters covered by the First Schedule to the Carriage by Air Act, 2012---Person, for whose benefit such claim could be made, came within the ambit of Second Schedule---In either case general provisions of law stood excluded and matter was to be determined within the four corners of Carriage by Air Act, 2012, read with its Conventions referred to in the Schedules---Said Act was special act and only provided mechanism to quantify damages under terms of Conventions---There was no exclusion provision in Carriage by Air Act, 2012, to exclude jurisdiction of any other court, tribunal or forum---Legislative intent was to be considered accordingly and claim submitted against petitioner required no interference---Consumer or complainant or any passenger who suffered loss at the hands of any carriage by air company or airline could either approach Consumer Court to claim his original amounts of loss suffered as consumer or could claim further damages, special damages, pecuniary damages from plenary court of civil jurisdiction---Rights of consumer with reference to damages or loss suffered could only be calculated on the yardstick provided in Carriage by Air Act, 2012---High Court declined to interfere in proceedings pending adjudication before Court under Islamabad Consumer Protection Act, 1995--- Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances. Evacuee Trust Property Board v. Mst. Sakina Bibi 2007 SCMR 262; The Gujranwala Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Hafizabad v. Muhammad Feroze PLD 1969 SC 252; Chalna Fiber Company Ltd. v. Abdul Jabbar PLD 1968 SC 381; Regional Manager, Adamjee Insurance Company Ltd. v. Presiding Officer, District Consumer Court,…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492