| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2022 SLG 1186 2022 SLD 1186 2022 SCMR 1477 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Petitions Nos. 149-L and 150-L of 2022, decision dated: 29th April, 2022. (On appeal against the judgment dated 24.12.2021 passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 27057-B of 2021)
MAZHAR ALAM KHAN MIANKHEL AND, JAMAL KHAN MANDOKHAIL, JUSTICE
Sh. Usman Karim-ud-Din, Advocate Supreme Court, Miss Hina Jilani, Advocate Supreme Court, Arshad Nazir Mirza, Advocate Supreme Court and Mirza Mehmood Ahmed, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioners (in both cases). Syed Nayyab Hussain Gerdezi, DAG, Mehmoo
Criminal Petitions Nos. 149-L and 150-L of 2022, decision dated: 29th April, 2022. (On appeal against the judgment dated 24.12.2021 passed by the Lahore High Court, Lahore in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 27057-B of 2021)
MAZHAR ALAM KHAN MIANKHEL AND, JAMAL KHAN MANDOKHAIL, JUSTICE
Sh. Usman Karim-ud-Din, Advocate Supreme Court, Miss Hina Jilani, Advocate Supreme Court, Arshad Nazir Mirza, Advocate Supreme Court and Mirza Mehmood Ahmed, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioners (in both cases). Syed Nayyab Hussain Gerdezi, DAG, Mehmoo
ZAHEER AHMAD and anothers
VS
The STATE and others
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 497
Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section: 295-A,295-B,295-C,298-C,34,109
Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 497--- Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss. 295-A, 295-B, 295-C, 298-C, 34 , 109---Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (XL of 2016), S. 11---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 185(3)---Propagation of Qadiani faith through social media by forwarding material and translation of Holy Quran proscribed by the government---Bail, refusal of---Accused was nominated in the FIR and he was one of the administrators of the WhatsApp group along with co-accused and forty other persons were also members of the said group---Certain proscribed book and banned text and translation of Holy Quran was shared in the said group---Co-accused disseminated banned material to accused and another co-accused for further sharing with public at large; he also used to provide derogatory books and guidelines to the accused through a WhatsApp number, registered in his name---According to the investigating officers, detailed forensic analysis of cell phones of the accused, and both co-accused was conducted by the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) and it was found that, the accused, being one of the administrator of the WhatsApp group, used to add and remove persons not belonging to Ahmadi community in the group on the instructions of co-accused---Sufficient incriminating material was available on record connecting the accused and co-accused with the commission of alleged offence---Petitions for leave to appeal were dismissed, leave was refused and accused and co-accused were refused bail. Sh. Usman Karim-ud-Din, Advocate Supreme Court, Miss Hina Jilani, Advocate Supreme Court, Arshad Nazir Mirza, Advocate Supreme Court and Mirza Mehmood Ahmed, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioners (in both cases). Syed Nayyab Hussain Gerdezi, DAG, Mehmood-ul-Hasan, D.D. (FIA), Mudassar Shah, D.D. (FIA) and Naveed Aslam, S.I. (FIA) for the State. Muhammad Shahid Tasawar, Advocate Supreme Court for the Complainant. hearing date: 21st April, 2022. ORDER MAZHAR ALAM KHAN MIANKHEL, J.s Shiraz Ahmad and Zaheer Ahmed have impugned the order dated 24.12.2021, whereby bail in case FIR No. 88 dated 20.06.2019, offence under sections 295-A, 298-C, P.P.C. and section 11 of the…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492