Law:

Section:

Keywords: Natural Justice, Non-Compliance, Manufacturing, Commission, Cancellation Of Registration, Alternate Remedy, Violation, Director, Order, Notification, Collective Bargaining Agent, Payment, Communication, Care, Consequential Orders, Grounds, Costs, Service Of Notice, Constitutional Jurisdiction, Registered Post, Notices, Period, Office, Appearance, Labour Court, Principle Of Natural Justice,, Evidence, Time-Barred, Contravention, Constitutional Petition, Place, Proceedings, Orders, Appellate Jurisdiction, Receipt, Bonus, Impugned Order, Illegal, Interpretation, Trade Union, Provisions, Call, Remedy, Original Documents, Civil Court, Summons, Technicalities, Commencement, Petitioner, Procedure, Dispute, Division, Endorsement, Information, Compliance, Consideration, Register, Registered, Notice, Government, Interference, Jurisdiction, Parties, Assume Jurisdiction, Necessity, Invalid, Manager, Cancellation, Validity, Petition, Copy, Writ Jurisdiction, Bailiff JUDGMENT The two petitioners, the Collective Bargaining Agent and one workman of respondent No. 4 have by this petition impugned several orders i.e. order dated 15-1-1975 passed by respondent No. 1\ the Provincial Government prohibiting the strike of the labourers of respondent No. 4, order dated 13-2-1975 passed by the 6th Sind Labour Court, Hyderabad, directing the workers to call off their strike and report for duty forthwith followed by another order dated 18-2-1975 dismissing 1459 workers from service, besides an order dated 13-3-1975 passed by the Registrar, Trade Unions, Hyderabad cancelling the registration of the petitioner No. 1 under section 10, clause 3 of the I. R. O. The Collective Bargaining Agent (C. B. A.) petitioner No. 1 had given a notice under section 26 of the 1. R. O. raising an industrial dispute relating to a demand of payment of bonus to the workers, but as the consequent bilateral negotiations, and conciliation proceedings failed, the strike was commenced by the workmen on 10-12-1974, and it is the case of the petitioners that respondent No. 4 had filed a criminal complaint on 6-12-1974 against the office-bearers of the C. B. A. under section I6 read with section 53 of the I.…

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492