| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2021 SLG 131 2021 SLD 131 2021 CLC 81 |
Peshawar High Court
C.R. No. 316-M of 2018, decision Dated: 17-09-2020, hearing Date : 27th February, 2020.
WIQAR AHMAD, JUSTICE
Haq Nawaz, Asstt. A.G. and Shams-ul-Hadi for
Respondents.
C.R. No. 316-M of 2018, decision Dated: 17-09-2020, hearing Date : 27th February, 2020.
WIQAR AHMAD, JUSTICE
Haq Nawaz, Asstt. A.G. and Shams-ul-Hadi for
Respondents.
MUKAMMAL SHAH
VS
SECRETARY C&W AND OTHERS
Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Section: (1),(2),(2-B)
Law: Specific Relief Act, 1877
Section: 42
Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----O.XXXIX, Rr. (1), (2) (2-B)---Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S.42---Suit for declaration---Temporary injunction, grant of---Ingredients---Trial Court accepted application for grant of temporary injunction against which appeal was dismissed---Defendants thereafter moved application for vacation of temporary injunction which was accepted and appeal against the said order was also dismissed---Validity---Plaintiff had admitted in his plaint that a thoroughfare existed on the spot---Said thoroughfare was not having a dead end near the property of plaintiff but had been leading to the area of another village and same was being used by inhabitants of said village---Defendants were using the said thoroughfare for access to their property---High Court observed that Project for construction of road on a thoroughfare was a project of public utility which was beneficial for all including the plaintiff---Substantial progress had been made in construction of the road---Construction work so conducted on the spot was of such a nature which could neither be reversed at this stage nor such an act was in anyones interest---Balance of convenience was in favour of continuation and completion of project for the benefit of community---Loss apprehended to the plaintiff in the present case had already been caused and in case property was found to be in his ownership then plaintiff might be compensated adequately---Loss in the present case would not be irreparable, in circumstances---Earlier order for grant of temporary injunction might not be regarded as any findings having achieved finality---Civil Court while deciding an application under O.XXXIX, R.2-B of C.P.C. could not be deemed to have been bound by the earlier decision made on an application for temporary injunction---Courts below were justified in taking a different view in the present case---Decision on application for temporary injunction was based on tentative assessment of record and findings recorded therein might not be termed as definite and final of a Court of law---Changes might occurred in the situation and subject matter of a suit---Court of law could not be bound by a first…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492