| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2022 SLG 1558 2022 SLD 1558 2022 PLJ 315 |
Mr. Muhammad Mushtaq Ahmad Dhoon, Advocate for Petitioner. Mian Shakeel Ahmed, A.A.G for Respondents. Ch. Peer Muhammad Gujjar, Advocate for Respondent No. 2.
ASJAD, JAVAID GHURAL AND ALI ZIA BAJWA, JJ.
Mr. Muhammad Sharif Karkhi, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. Muhammad Imtiaz Hussain Marali, Assistant Advocate General for State. Mehr Ghulam Shabbir Aheer, Advocate for
Respondent No. 3.
GHULAM SHABBIR--Appellant
VS
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 22-A,22-B
Law: Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972
Section: 3
Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)-- ----Ss. 22-A , 22-B--Law Reforms Ordinance, (XII of 1972), S. 3--Producing of document during trial of Civil suit--Application for registration of case--Declined--Writ petition--Direction to recording of statement of Respondent No. 3--Determination of sanctity of document--Challenge to--If any document is produced during course of trial proceedings and at time of conclusion of trial, such Court arrives at conclusion that document produced before it was forged, it could take cognizance of matter--Unless and until it is evaluated that document is forged or not, no order for registration of a case on basis of such documents should be passed--Trial Court shall determine sanctity of document in question--Appeal allowed. ORDER Through the instant Intra Court Appeal filed under Section 3 of the Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972, the appellant has assailed the vires of order dated 16.11.2020, passed by learned Single Judge in Chamber by virtue of which while allowing Writ Petition No. 9750/2016 filed by Allah Ditta/Respondent No. 3, SHO, Police Station Civil Line, Dera Ghazi Khan/Respondent No. 2 was directed to record his statement under Section 154, Cr.P.C. and proceed further in the matter. 2. We have heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the appellant, learned counsel for Respondent No. 3, as well as, learned Assistant Advocate General. 3. Perusal of record available on file reflects that during the course of proceedings of a civil suit titled ‘Muhammad Naseer etc. vs. Allah Dittaetc’ pending before learned Senior Civil Judge, Dera Ghazi Khan, allegedly some documents bearing forged signatures of Mushtaq Ahmed Sandhela on the plaint were produced before the learned trial Court, who according to version of…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492