Case Details

Citation(s)
2021 SLG 393 2021 SLD 393 2021 SCMR 1430
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petitions Nos. 805-L to 812-L and 814-L of 2019, decided on 9th March, 2021. Date of hearing: 9th March, 2021. (Against the consoli Dated order Dated 20.2.2019 passed by the Lahore High Court in W.Ps. Nos. 246503, 254424-25, 254408, 254428, 254415,
UMAR ATA BANDIAL, JUSTICE, SAJJAD ALI SHAH, JUSTICE, YAHYA AFRIDI, JUSTICE
Nadeem ud Din Malik, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner. Pirzada Mamoon Rashid, Advocate Supreme Court for
Respondent No. 1 (VL Lhr.).

HAJI MUHAMMAD LATIF

VS

MUHAMMAD SHARIF AND OTHERS

Law: Punjab Rented Premises Act, 2009

Section: 22(6)

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 199

(a) Punjab Rented Premises Act (VII of 2009)--- ----S. 22(6)---Leave to contest, refusal of---Rent Tribunal refusing leave to contest filed by tenants but fixing ejectment petitions for production of supporting evidence of the landlord and awarding the tenants a right to cross-examine the landlord and his witnesses---Legality---Provision of S. 22(6) of the Punjab Rented Premises Act, 2009 (the Act) specifically provide that in case where the leave to contest was refused or the tenant had failed to file application for leave to contest within the stipulated time, the Rent Tribunal shall pass the final order---Section 22(6) of the Act being a mandatory provision with the consequences spelled out left no option for the Rent Controller but to pass final order---Order passed by Rent Tribunal was against the mandate of S. 22(6) of the Act---Petitions for leave to appeal were converted into appeals and allowed and Rent Tribunal was directed to decide the ejectment petitions through a final order in terms of the provisions of S. 22(6) of the Act. (b) Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art. 199---Constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court---Scope---Interim order---In cases where a statute specifically barred the remedy of appeal against an interim order then such statutory command ordinarily should not be circumvented by allowing parties to invoke writ jurisdiction.       ORDER SAJJAD ALI SHAH, J.---The petitioners seek leave of this Court to file appeals against a common order of the Lahore High Court dismissing all the petitions by holding the impugned order of the, Rent Controller as interim whereby the Rent Controller though declined to grant leave to defend the ejectment petitions but directed the petitioner to adduce evidence and granted respondent right to cross-examine. 2. Briefly, the petitioner filed nine ejectment petitions against his different tenants inter alia, on the ground of default, the respondents having been served, filed applications seeking leave to defend the ejectment proceedings. The learned Rent Controller, after hearing the parties, through a common order declined to grant leave to the tenants to defend the ejectment…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492