Case Details

Citation(s)
2021 SLG 136 2021 SLD 136 2021 CLC 106
Balochistan High Court
Civil Revisions Nos. 13, 22 and 56 of 2014, decision Dated: 22nd November, 2019, hearing Date : 11-11-2019.
NAZEER AHMED LANGOVE, JUSTICE
Rasool Bakhsh Baloch for Petitioners (in Civil Revision No.13 of 2014). Rasool Bakhsh Baloch for Petitioners (in Civil Revision No.22 of 2014). Abdul Khair Achakzai for Petitioners (in Civil Revision No.56 of 2014) Jameel Ahmed Babai for
Respondent No.

DR. AZIZ UR REHMAN AND OTHERS

VS

NOOR BIBI AND OTHERS

Law: Transfer of Property Act, 1882

Section: 41

(a) Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882)--- ----S.41---Transfer by ostensible owner---Scope---Inheritance---Gift---Ingredients---Proof---Mutation---Co-sharer---Bona fide purchaser---Contention of plaintiff was that she was owner of suit property and impugned mutations were illegal whereas defendants contended that suit property had been transferred in their favour through gift---Suit was decreed concurrently---Validity---Limitation did not run against a void transaction nor efflux of time could extinguish right of inheritance---Mutation was not a proof of title and beneficiary was bound to prove original transaction---Once it was established that plaintiff was entitled for inheritance then she would become co-sharer in each and every inch of the property of deceased predecessor---Plaintiff was entitled to inherit the left-over of her deceased father as she had become co-sharer in the property on death of her father to the extent of her share---Co-sharers could not alienate the property more than their shares---Each co-sharer would be deemed to be owner in joint property and anyone of them could not act against rights and liabilities of other co-sharers---Donee excluding any heir from inheritance was required to establish the original transaction of gift---Nothing was on record with regard to declaration of gift or its acceptance---Mere transfer of possession to the donee was not sufficient to constitute a valid gift---Gift deed must justify the disinheritance of an heir which in the present case was lacking---Transfer of property should be for consideration and transferee must have acted in good faith taking reasonable care to ascertain that transferor had the power to transfer the property---Subsequent purchaser of suit property had not taken care of important aspect of the matter---Right of transferee should be protected from the share of defendants and not from the share of plaintiff---Principle of bona fide purchaser was based on equity which could not be invoked in such a manner that might cause injustice to the others---Vendees of suit property should claim their right, if any, from their transferors-defendants---Plaintiff being residuary of deceased…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492