Case Details

Citation(s)
2022 SLG 1578 2022 SLD 1578 2022 PLJ 420
Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, Rawalpindi
W.P. No. 4658 of 2021-BWP, decided on 23.9.2021.
MUHAMMAD AMJAD RAFIQ, J.
Malik Saeed Ijaz, Advocate. Mr. Jam Muhammad Afzal Gasoora, Assistant Advocate General. Mr. Zafar Iqbal Sheikh, Advocate for
Respondent No. 2.

Dr. MUHAMMAD JEHANGIR AKBARs

VS

STATE, etc.

Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Section: 200

Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 (V of 1898)-- ----S. 200--Filing of private complaint--Dismissal of complaint--Dismissal of criminal revision--Recording of statement of accused persons--Objection regarding recording of statements of respondents--After receipt of complaint statement of complainant was recoded on oath--No procedural illegality or irregularity has been committed by Magistrate in issuing notices to respondents, recording their statements at cursory stage and then satisfying its conscience about truth or falsehood of complaint was booked in an FIR No. 540/2020 under section 25-D of Telegraph Act registered at police station Shah Rukn-i-Alam, Multan and as a matter of fact it was episode of his arrest which was transformed into his abduction by petitioner either for himself or for his family members--Inquiring Court has rightly passed impugned order--Consequently, I see no illegality in impugned order which could warrant interference by High Courts--Petition dismissed. PLD 1972 Lahore 185, 1985 Cr.J 1309 ,  AIR 1935 Lah. 14 ref. ORDER Briefly the facts of the case relevant for the decision of instant writ petition are that Dr. Muhammad Jehangir petitioner filed a private complaint against the respondents, wherein, after giving background of some previous litigation, the precise allegation was that on 19.10.2020 at about 9/10.00 pm. He (the petitioner/complainant) along with Umar Daraz, Malik Mumtaz Hussain and Haji Muhammad Afzal came out of the house and when reached the shop of Pir Gi, accused (Respondents No. 1 to 3 and 5 of the complaint) who were standing there caught hold of him, tortured him, accused/Respondent No. 1 from petitioners pocket took, out Rs. 17500/-, one mobile SI Pro VIVO and one signed cheque No. 00016986 of Askari Bank and by keeping him in unlawful custody kept him roaming in official vehicle ڈالا and then accused/Respondent No. 1 made a call to accused/ Respondent No. 4 and on his asking the police of police station Shah Rukn-e-Alam came there about three hours later and told that a case had been registered against the petitioner. The petitioner was taken to police station Shah Rukn-e-Alam and was confined there. It was…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492