Case Details

Citation(s)
2022 SLG 1581 2022 SLD 1581 2022 PLJ 437
Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, Multan
C.R. No. 113 of 2018 C.R. No. 1674 of 2017, decided on 13.9.2021.
SULTAN TANVIR AHMAD, J.
Malik Muhammad Tariq Nonari, Advocate for Petitioner (in Revision Petition No. 113-2018). Mr. Iqbal Hussain Jafri, Advocate for
Respondents. Mr. Iqbal Hussain Jafri, Advocate for Petitioner (in Revision Petition No. 1674-2017). Malik Muhammad Tariq Nonari

Mst. SHAHNAZ PARVEEN

VS

Mst. ASMA KALSOOM 20 others

Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)

Section: 42

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908)-- ----S. 42--Suit for declaration--Decreed--Appeal Filing of applicationor impleadment as party during pendency of appeal--Accepted--Matter was remanded--Producing of documents at appeal stageby respondent--Determination of documents--Challenge to--Admissibility of documents cannot be determined without giving chance to parties to exhibit same and or chance to produce makers and witnesses of documents--Any ruling as to authenticity of documents without proper examination can result into miscarriage of justice and at same time shall prejudice trial and/or appeals-- Order of remand by Appellate Court is simply a matter sent to trial Court for re-examination and this order is not final determination of rights of parties--Discretion exercise by Appellate Court is neither unwarranted nor unjust in circumstances--Counsel of petitioner has failed to make out any case of material irregularity or illegality, requiring interference in revisional jurisdiction--Revision petition dismissed. PLD 1962 SC 291 ref. Power of Court-- ----Court is empowered, at all stages of proceedings, to add any party or parties whose presence before Court is necessary to adjudicate upon real matter in dispute or when presence of parties is necessary to enable Court to effectually and completely adjudicate upon matter. JUDGMENT Through this single judgment, the captioned revision petitions being outcome of same order, alongwith all the civil miscellaneous applications, shall be decided together. 2. The present revision petitions are arising out of the consolidated order dated 23.10.2017 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Khanewal in civil appeals. 3. The facts, necessary for the decision of these civil revisions, are that Mst. Shahnaz Parveen (the ‘Petitioner’) obtained a judgment and decree dated 22.02.2016 in civil suits No. 59 of 1997, whereby she was declared as lawful daughter of Hussain Ahmad Khan and Mst. Khursheed Jahan and Mutation No. 183 dated 19.01.1972 was cancelled. The Petitioner was held entitled to inherit the estate of her parents alongwith sisters namely Mst. Munawar Jahan and Mst. Raees Jahan and brother Sarwar Ali Khan.…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492