| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2021 SLG 982 2021 SLD 982 2021 CLC 996 |
Sindh High Court
C.P. D-7061 of 2017, decided on 17th February, 2020, Date of hearing: 11th December, 2019.
MOHAMMAD ALI MAZHAR, JUSTICE, AGHA FAISAL, JUSTICE
Haseeb Jamali and Muneer Khan for Petitioners. Kafeel Ahmed Abbasi, Deputy Attorney General and Ghulam Mohiuddin, Assistant Attorney General for
Respondents. Fasih-uz-Zaman for
Respondents Nos.2 to 4.
C.P. D-7061 of 2017, decided on 17th February, 2020, Date of hearing: 11th December, 2019.
MOHAMMAD ALI MAZHAR, JUSTICE, AGHA FAISAL, JUSTICE
Haseeb Jamali and Muneer Khan for Petitioners. Kafeel Ahmed Abbasi, Deputy Attorney General and Ghulam Mohiuddin, Assistant Attorney General for
Respondents. Fasih-uz-Zaman for
Respondents Nos.2 to 4.
BISMILLAH METAL IMPEX (PVT.) LIMITED THROUGH DIRECTOR
VS
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF INDUSTRIES AND PRODUCTION AND 4 OTHERS
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199
(a) Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art.199---Constitutional jurisdiction---Scope---Contractual dues, recovery of---Scope---Petitioner sought recovery of its contractual dues from government department through invocation of constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Contention of petitioner was that he could not be non-suited on the ground of forum non conveniens as technicalities must not come in the way of substantial justice---Validity---Petitioner was unable to proffer any justification as to why the forum of appropriate jurisdiction was not approached for the redressal of its grievance---Alternate remedy was clearly available to the petitioner and in such context resort to Art.199 of the Constitution was misconceived---Disputed question of fact and/or contractual matters were not generally amenable for determination in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction---Petitioner might have prima facie demonstrated the existence of a commercial claim before the court, however, such a claim did not become actionable before the constitutional jurisdiction of High Court---Constitutional petition, being not maintainable, was dismissed. 2005 MLD 233 and PLD 2001 SC 116 distinguished. (b) Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art.199---Constitutional jurisdiction---Questions of fact---Contractual matters---Scope---Disputed question of fact and/or contractual matters are not generally amenable for determination in the exercise of constitutional jurisdiction. 2015 PLC 45; 2015 CLD 1257; PLD 2011 SC 44 and PLD 2007 SC 642 ref. (c) Constitution of Pakistan--- ----Art.199---Constitutional jurisdiction---Contractual controversies---Scope---Contractual controversies are not amenable to resolution before the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Courts. Province of Sindh v. Abdul Sattar Arbani C.P. 654-K of 2018 ref. JUDGMENT AGHA FAISAL, J.---- The petitioner, being a purveyor of metals, has filed this petition seeking recovery of its contractual dues from the Pakistan Steel Mills Corporation Limited (PSM / Respondent No.2). 2. The brief facts pertinent hereto are that PSM invited bids for the supply of aluminum ingots and the petitioner made deliveries in pursuance thereof.…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492