Case Details

Citation(s)
2022 SLG 203 2022 SLD 203 2022 SCMR 321
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petitions Nos. 181-Q to 184-Q of 2021, decided on 25th October, 2021. Date of hearing: 25th October, 2021. (Against the judgment dated 06.05.2021 passed by the High Court of Balochistan, Quetta in Review Petition No. 04 of 2021 in Civil Revision No
SARDAR TARIQ MASOOD, JUSTICE, AMIN-UD-DIN KHAN, JUSTICE, MUHAMMAD ALI MAZHAR, JUSTICE
Liaqat Ali Tareen, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioners. Shamsuddin Achakzai, Advocate Supreme Court for
Respondent No. 1.

ABDUL QADIR AND 2 OTHErs

VS

JAHANGIR KHAN AND OTHERS

Law: Civil Procedure Code (Amendment) Ordinance, 1980

Section: 114,115&O.,XLVII,R.1

Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)--- ----Ss. 114, 115 O. XLVII, R. 1---Supreme Court Rules, 1980, O. XIII, R. 1---Petition for leave to appeal before the Supreme Court under Art. 185(3) of the Constitution---Limitation---Review jurisdiction of the High Court---Scope---Civil revision petitions dismissed by the High Court---Review petition against dismissal of revision petitions also dismissed by the High Court as being not competent---Question as to whether after dismissal of review petition the party was allowed to assail validity of both the orders i.e. order of dismissal of review as well as dismissal of revision petitions when against the order of dismissal of revision petitions the limitation for filing a petition for leave to appeal before the Supreme Court under Art. 185(3) of the Constitution had expired---Held, that petitioner failed to show the Court any point pleaded in his review petition before the High Court whereby any reason for invoking the jurisdiction of the High Court for exercise of review jurisdiction was permissible was also unable to satisfy the Court as to why he did not choose to challenge the dismissal of revision petitions directly before the Supreme Court and instead preferred a review petition before the High Court---All the points raised in review petition before the High Court seemed to be an attempt to seek rehearing of whole of the matter---When review petition had simply been dismissed without altering given in revisional jurisdiction no question arose of merger of of revisional court into the review s could not file a petition for leave to appeal in the Supreme Court when his review petition had been dismissed without any modification to the original passed in the revision petition except to the extent of legality of exercise of review jurisdiction---Furthermore all present petitions for leave to appeal before the Supreme Court were barred by limitation when time of limitation was considered from the dates when the certified copies of s of High Court in its revisional jurisdiction were prepared and issued---Since the revision petition was dismissed by the High Court against which no petition for leave to appeal was filed before…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492