| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2021 SLG 418 2021 SLD 418 2021 PLJ 8 |
Islamabad High Court
C.R. No. 191 of 2017, decided on 18.11.2020, Date of hearing: 27.10.2020.
FIAZ AHMAD ANJUM, JANDRAN, JUSTICE
Mr. Manzoor Hussain, Advocate for Petitioner. Malik Javid Iqbal Wains, Advocate for
Respondent.
C.R. No. 191 of 2017, decided on 18.11.2020, Date of hearing: 27.10.2020.
FIAZ AHMAD ANJUM, JANDRAN, JUSTICE
Mr. Manzoor Hussain, Advocate for Petitioner. Malik Javid Iqbal Wains, Advocate for
Respondent.
NAJEEB MEHMOOD
VS
CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH CHAIRMAN
Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Section: 115,1,2
Law: Specific Relief Act, 1877
Section: 12,42,54
Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (V of 1908)-- ----S. 115 O.XXXIX Rr. 1, 2--Specific Relief Act, (I of 1877), Ss. 12, 42 54--Suit for declaration, specific performance, perpetual and mandatory injunction--Dismissed for non-prosecution--Application for restoration--Dismissed--Appeal--Mandate of proceedings-- Final opportunity for arguments on application for temporary injunction--Question of--Whether Court can decide suit, when date is not fixed for its decision rather for hearing/decision upon an application for temporary injunction--Challenge to--Suit was at stage of arguments/decision upon application for temporary injunction when it was dismissed for non-prosecution which, as a matter of course, could not have been dismissed being beyond mandate of proceedings fixed for that particular date i.e. decision upon application for temporary injunction--When Court adjourned matter for next date with specific caution, that last and final opportunity for arguments on application for temporary injunction is granted--On said date again matter was adjourned till 12:30 pm for arguments but instead of passing of an order upon said application, decided main suit by announcing order suit dismissed for non-prosecution--This amounts to a surprise order because as per law when an application was fixed then any other order except an order upon said application amounts to a surprise order, which is not warranted by law--Revision petition was allowed. [P. 12] A B 1993 SCMR 1949 and 2005 MLD 1483 ref. JUDGMENT Through the instant Civil Revision Petition, petitioner impugns orders dated 25.11.2016 and 24.01.2017, passed by the learned Senior…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492