Case Details

Citation(s)
2020 SLG 1723 2020 SLD 1723 2020 PLC 593
Lahore High Court, Multan Bench, Multan
I.C.A. No. 158 of 2019, heard on 12-11-2019
ABID AZIZ SHEIKH, JUSTICE MUZAMIL AKHTAR SHABIR, JUSTICE
Mian Muhammad Azhar Saleem Kamlana, AAG along with Muhammad Hassan Tahir, Inspector DPO Officer, Muzaffargarh for Appellants. Ch. Abdul Sattar Goraya for
Respondent.

GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB AND OTHERS

VS

SYED MUHAMMAD SALEEM SHAH

Law: Punjab Service Tribunals Act, (IX of 1974)

Section: 4(1)(b)

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 199,212

(a) Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974)--- ----S. 4(1)(b)---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts.199 & 212---Constitutional petition---Maintainability---Promotion---Fitness for promotion---Principles---Terms and conditions of service---Bar on jurisdiction contained under Art.212 of the Constitution---Determination of fitness---Scope---Employee was not recommended for promotion by the Departmental Promotion Committee---Constitutional petition filed by the employee was allowed by Single Judge of the High Court---Validity---Departmental Promotion Committee had observed that employee had doubtful integrity and was professionally incompetent---Assessment of Departmental Promotion Committee was subjective assessment based on objective criteria---Question of determination of fitness of a person to be promoted was not capable of being scrutinized on the basis of judicially manageable standards---Fitness did introduce an element of subjective evaluation on the basis of objective criteria---Substitution of opinion of competent authority by the Court was not possible---Where competent authority had acted in violation of law or in excess of jurisdiction only then constitutional jurisdiction of High Court could be invoked---Department itself had devised objective criteria by issuing policy guidelines and developing method for assessment for the performance of officer for the purpose of promotion---Said assessment was based upon subjective opinion of the evaluation reports---High Court could not sit in over the said subjective evaluation but could only examine if objective criteria was followed or not by the competent authority---Single Judge of High Court had neither examined subjective evaluation nor considered the objective criteria for determination of fitness---Nothing was on record that competent authority had passed order in colourable exercise of power or order was without jurisdiction or against law or mala fide---Service Tribunal had exclusive jurisdiction in the matter with regard to terms and conditions of person in the service of Pakistan---Impugned order passed by Single Judge of High Court was set aside by the Division Bench---Intra-court appeal was…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492