| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2023 SLG 2451 2023 SLD 2451 2023 PLJ 112 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
J.P. No. 355 of 2018, decided on 2.1.2023. (On appeal against the judgment dated 22.02.2018 passed by the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench in Criminal Appeal No. 481/2012) Date of hearing: 2.1.2023.
Present: IJAZ-UL-AHSAN AND SAYYED MAZAHAR ALI AKBAR NAQVI, JJ.
Ms. Sabahat Rizvi, ASC for Petitioners (Via video link from Lahore). Mirza Muhammad Usman, DPG Punjab for State. Mr. Abdul Khaliq Safrani, ASC for Complainant (Via video link from Lahore).
J.P. No. 355 of 2018, decided on 2.1.2023. (On appeal against the judgment dated 22.02.2018 passed by the Lahore High Court, Multan Bench in Criminal Appeal No. 481/2012) Date of hearing: 2.1.2023.
Present: IJAZ-UL-AHSAN AND SAYYED MAZAHAR ALI AKBAR NAQVI, JJ.
Ms. Sabahat Rizvi, ASC for Petitioners (Via video link from Lahore). Mirza Muhammad Usman, DPG Punjab for State. Mr. Abdul Khaliq Safrani, ASC for Complainant (Via video link from Lahore).
MUHAMMAD ABBAS and another--Petitioners
VERSUS
STATE--Respondent
Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section: 302(2)
Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (XLV of 1860)-- ----S. 302(c)--Qatl-e-amd--Conviction and sentence--Challenge to--Conviction and sentence--Challenge to--Ocular account--Substitution in such like cases is a rare phenomenon--Testimony of witnesses--Ocular account furnished by prosecution is reliable, straightforward and confidence inspiring--The medical evidence available on record is in line with ocular account--In these circumstances, it can safely be said that prosecution has brought on record reliable evidence to sustain conviction of petitioners--However, so far as quantum of punishment is concerned, that occurrence took place at spur of moment and there was no pre-meditation on part of petitioners--Something happened immediately before occurrence, which provoked petitioners and they caused churri blows on person of deceased--On our specific query, Law Officer and counsel for complainant could not deny fact that occurrence took place at spur of moment--Admittedly, both petitioners did not repeat their act--There was no deep rooted enmity between parties--In these circumstances, High Court ought to have taken a lenient view--Consequently, Court convict petitioners under Section 302(c), PPC and sentence them to fourteen years RI each--The amount of fine and sentence in default whereof shall remain intact. Testimony of Witnesses-- ----It is by now a well established principle of law that mere relationship of prosecution witnesses with deceased cannot be a ground to discard testimony of such witnesses. JUDGMENT Sayyed Mazahar Ali Akbar Naqvi, J.--Petitioners along with two co-accused were tried by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Chichawatni in a private complaint under Sections 302/148/149, PPC for committing murder of Muhammad Sarfraz. The same was instituted being dissatisfied with the investigation conducted by the Police in case FIR No. 85 dated 10.04.2009 under Sections 302/148/149, PPC at Police Station Ghaziabad, District Sahiwal. The learned trial Court vide its judgment dated 28.06.2012 while acquitting the two co-accused, convicted the petitioners under Section 302(b), PPC and sentenced them to imprisonment for life. They were also directed to pay…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492