| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2023 SLG 1973 2023 629 2023 SLD 1973 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No. 2021 of 2019, decided on 4th October, 2022. (Against the judgment dated 05.04.2019 passed by the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad, in M.P. No. 2047/2018 in Appeal No.483(P)CS/2013)Date of hearing: 4th October, 2022.
Present: Sardar Tariq Masood, Amin-ud-Din Khan and Muhammad Ali Mazhar, JJ
Muhammad Ramzan Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Muhammad Sharif Janjua, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Nemo for
Respondents. Ch. Amir Rehman, Additional A.G.P. on Court's Call.
Civil Petition No. 2021 of 2019, decided on 4th October, 2022. (Against the judgment dated 05.04.2019 passed by the Federal Service Tribunal, Islamabad, in M.P. No. 2047/2018 in Appeal No.483(P)CS/2013)Date of hearing: 4th October, 2022.
Present: Sardar Tariq Masood, Amin-ud-Din Khan and Muhammad Ali Mazhar, JJ
Muhammad Ramzan Khan, Advocate Supreme Court and Muhammad Sharif Janjua, Advocate-on-Record for Petitioner. Nemo for
Respondents. Ch. Amir Rehman, Additional A.G.P. on Court's Call.
ABDUL QUDOOS
VERSUS
COMMANDANT FRONTIER CONSTABULARY, KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PESHAWAR and another
Law: Service Tribunals Act, 1973
Section: 4(1)
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199
(a) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)--- ----S. 4(1)---Appeal filed by employee of Frontier Constabulary (F.C.)---Service Tribunal, jurisdiction of---Scope---F.C. employees are civil servants and, in a matter relating to the terms and conditions of service, they can approach the Tribunal and file an appeal in accordance with law. Commandant, Frontier Constabulary, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar and others v. Gul Raqib Khan and others 2018 SCMR 903 ref. (b) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973)--- ----S. 4(1)---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199---Constitution petition filed by employee of Frontier Constabulary (F.C.) remitted to the Service Tribunal after consent of both parties---Service Tribunal, jurisdiction of---Scope---After the petitioner [employee of Frontier Constabulary (F.C.)] filed a writ petition in the High Court, the High Court remanded the matter to the Service Tribunal with the direction that the writ petition filed before the High Court shall be treated as a service appeal pending before it, which will be decided after issuing notices to the parties concerned in accordance with law---Counsel for the parties by consent agreed that the pending writ petition may be remitted to the Tribunal for decision and finally, the High Court in view of the dictum laid down in the case of Muhammad Anis and others v. Abdul Haseeb and others (PLD 1994 SC 539), observed that the petitioner had already filed the departmental appeal before filing the writ petition, therefore, with the consent of counsel for the parties, the matter was sent to the Tribunal for further adjudication subject to all just and legal objections, including limitation---In view of the directions of the High Court which were binding upon the Tribunal, neither the petitioner was required to file any application for resurrection of the earlier disposed of appeal by the Tribunal on the ground of jurisdiction, nor the Tribunal could dismiss the application on the ground of limitation---As a matter of fact, only the memo of writ petition filed in the High Court was to be transmitted to the Tribunal for decision on merits, but the Tribunal without proper application of mind dismissed the restoration…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492