| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2023 SLG 408 2023 SLD 408 2023 PLC 236 |
High Court (AJ&K)
Writ Petition No.10-D of 2021, decided on 13th October, 2021. Date of hearing: 13th October, 2021.
ABDUL SHAKOOR AND MUHAMMAD NAEEM ANWAR, JJ
Ahmad Ali for Petitioner. Nemo. for
Respondents (Motion case).
Writ Petition No.10-D of 2021, decided on 13th October, 2021. Date of hearing: 13th October, 2021.
ABDUL SHAKOOR AND MUHAMMAD NAEEM ANWAR, JJ
Ahmad Ali for Petitioner. Nemo. for
Respondents (Motion case).
Malik SHAH JAHAN
VERSUS
GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Provincial Police Officer/IGP, Peshawar
Law: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Service Tribunal Act, (I of 1974)
Section: 4,5
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 199,212
(a) Maxim--- ----Vigilantibus non dormientius aequitas subvenit: Equity aids vigilant and not the one who sleeps over his rights---Maxim refers to unreasonable delay enforcing a legal claim--- Sleeping over his rights is such a right which is no longer available as it is barred by laches. Member (S,R) Chief Settlement Commissioner Board of Revenue v. Syed Ashfaque Ali PLD 2003 SC 132 rel. (b) Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Service Tribunals Act (I of 1974)--- ----Ss.4, 5---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 199, 212---Constitutional petition---Terms and conditions of service---Restoration in service---Acquittal from criminal charge---Petitioner was removed from service in year 2013, for his involvement in two criminal cases---After acquittal from one criminal case in year 2015 and in other case in year 2019, petitioner sought his reinstatement in year 2021---Validity---Non-obstante clause of Arts. 212(1), (2) of the Constitution began with not withstanding anything hereinbefore contained, which had overriding on Constitutional jurisdiction of High Court under Art.199 of the Constitution which was already subject to the Constitution---Scope of jurisdiction and powers of Service Tribunal were provided in Ss. 4, 5 of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Service Tribunals Act, 1974---High Court did not have any jurisdiction to entertain any proceedings in respect of terms and conditions of service of a civil servant, which could be adjudicated by Service Tribunal under Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Service Tribunals Act, 1974---Any transgression to exclusion contained under Art. 212 of the Constitution, would render order of High Court void and illegal---Unless jurisdiction of Service Tribunal was ousted under S.4(1) (b) of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Service Tribunals Act, 1974, assumption of jurisdiction by High Court in respect of matters of terms and conditions of civil servant was unconstitutional and impermissible--- Constitutional petition was dismissed, in circumstances. Member (S,R) Chief Settlement Commissioner Board of Revenue v. Syed Ashfaque Ali PLD 2003 SC 132; Khaliq Dad v. Inspector General of Police and 2 others 2004 SCMR 192; Government of N.W.F.-P through Secretary Finance, Excise and Taxation…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492