| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2020 SLG 1201 2020 SLD 1201 2020 MLD 1198 |
Sindh High Court
C.M.A. No. 7184 of 2019 in Civil Suit No. 1104 of 2004, decided on 11th October, 2019, hearing Date : 4th October, 2019.
FAHIM AHMED SIDDIQUI, JUSTICE
Muhammad Junaid Khatri for Plaintiffs Nos.1, 3, 4, 5 and 7. Muhammad Rafique Khan for Plaintiffs Nos. 2 and 6. Ms. Soofia Saeed for Defendant No.3. Sikandar Khan for Applicant.
C.M.A. No. 7184 of 2019 in Civil Suit No. 1104 of 2004, decided on 11th October, 2019, hearing Date : 4th October, 2019.
FAHIM AHMED SIDDIQUI, JUSTICE
Muhammad Junaid Khatri for Plaintiffs Nos.1, 3, 4, 5 and 7. Muhammad Rafique Khan for Plaintiffs Nos. 2 and 6. Ms. Soofia Saeed for Defendant No.3. Sikandar Khan for Applicant.
AZAM ZAHEER KHAN AND 6 OTHERS
VS
IQBAL ZAHEER KHAN AND 2 OTHERS
Law: Specific Relief Act, 1877
Section: 54
Law: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908)
Section: 85,88,114
Specific Relief Act (I of 1877)--- ----S. 54---Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O. XXI, Rr. 85, 88 & S.114---Suit for partition, separate possession, perpetual injunction, rendition of account and mesne profit---Review---Execution proceedings---Enhancement of bid amount---Right of legal heir filed review against enhancement of bid issued by Trial Court to respondent who was legal heir in suit property---Plea raised by applicant was that he had already submitted 25% of bid amount being highest bidder---Validity---In all public sales, authorities including court and its staff was to protect interests of parties---Unless highest bid offered by applicant was accepted by court and entire amount was deposited by him, he had no legal right or character in property in question---Preferential right of legal heir was also a legal obligation upon court---Bid of co-sharer according to O.XXI, R.88, C.P.C. had preference over bid of any outsider---Whenever a co-sharer offered to match highest bid and same was not objected by other co-sharers, there could be no reason to refuse such an offer---If a matching or better offer was received from co-sharer and other co-sharers were satisfied with such offer, there would be no need to give notice to higher bidder for enhancing his bid---Order under review was not passed behind back as same was passed in presence of counsel for the applicant---High Court declined to interfere in order passed by Trial Court as there was no merit in application---Review was dismissed in circumstances. THIS ORDER PASSED BY: FAHIM AHMED SIDDIQUI, JUSTICE:---.---Through the listed application, the applicant intends to review the order dated 15-01-2019, whereby an offer by the defendant No. 3 (one of the LRs/shareholders) of matching rather enhancing the bid amount for the purchase of Plot No. 6/9-G, Nazimabad No. 4, Karachi, was accepted. 2. Briefly, the factual matrix of the case is that the plaintiffs and defendants are the legal heirs of deceased Muhammad Zaheer Khan, as such, they are co-sharers in the property in question i.e. built-up house on Plot No. 6/9-G, Nazimabad No. 4, Karachi. In compliance of order dated 23-11-2009 and subsequent…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492