| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 1975 SLG 891 1975 SLD 891 1975 PCRLJ 1402 |
Sindh High Court
Criminal Acquittal Appeal No. 419 of 1970, 16th April, 1975
MUHAMMAD HALEEM AND ZAKAULLAH LODHI, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
Criminal Acquittal Appeal No. 419 of 1970, 16th April, 1975
MUHAMMAD HALEEM AND ZAKAULLAH LODHI, JJ
Deprecated: str_replace(): Passing null to parameter #3 ($subject) of type array|string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 395
The State
VS
Abdullah
Law:
Section:
Keywords: Goods, Possession, Investigation, Disposed Of, Practice, Petition, Prosecution, Procedure, Information, Leave, Charge-Sheet, Contravention, Magistrate, Order, Appeal Against Acquittal, Quashment, Parties, Provisions, Customs, Land, Aggrieved Party, Leave To Appeal, Jurisdiction, Exports, Proceedings, High Court, Cognizance Result: Orders accordingly JUDGMENT MUHAMMAD HALEEM, J. The respondent, who is a driver of truck No. KAU 5596 was tried alongwith Dodo for carrying controband goods in his truck on 19th September 1969 at 2-30 a. m. Dodo, however, died during the pendency of the trial and it was Abdullah who was ulti mately acquitted by the First Class Magistrate, Thatta vide judgment dated 28th April 1970. 2. According to the facts repealed, Umedali S. D. I. Received secret information on 18th September 1969 that contraband goods would be transported from Gharo to Karachi via Sakro road. Accordingly he arranged 'nakabandi' on the road near the bridge of Afin Wah and detained the truck and secured 25 bales of foreign cloth in the presence of mashir Mitho Khan and Walidad. Thereafter he lodged a report at 3 a. In. The same day on behalf of the State registering the case against them under section 167 (81) of the Sea Customs Act, 1878, hereinafter referred to as the Act, and after investigation, the S. D. I. Submitted the challan in the Court of S. D. M. Thatta. At the trial, the jurisdiction of the Court was assailed and, therefore, the learned Magistrate framed the following issue: "Whether the Court has got jurisdiction to try this case without any complaint made in writing by Custom authorities ? and after hearing the parties he decided the issue in the negative and acquitted the respondent. In acquitting him, the learned Magistrate relied on the case of State v. Hamtho (1968 P Cr. L J 1116) which judgment was upheld by the Supreme Court while refusing leave, vide The State v. Hamtho (1971 S C M R 626). 3. The State has appealed against the acquittal relying on the decision of the Supreme Court in Saleh Muhammad v. The State (P L D 1969 S C 461). In that case, the Assistant Inspector of the District Anti-corruption Bureau, Barisal obtained a search…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492