| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2022 SLG 2295 2022 SLD 2295 2022 SCMR 1770 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petition No. 3122 of 2020, decided on 28th February,2022.
UMAR ATA BANDIAL, C.J., SAJJAD ALI SHAH AND MUHAMMAD ALI MAZHAR, JJ
Aftab Alam Yasir, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.Shaukat Rauf Siddiqui, Additional A.G., Punjab with M. Aslam Gondal, Inspector Gujrat for
Respondents.
Civil Petition No. 3122 of 2020, decided on 28th February,2022.
UMAR ATA BANDIAL, C.J., SAJJAD ALI SHAH AND MUHAMMAD ALI MAZHAR, JJ
Aftab Alam Yasir, Advocate Supreme Court for Petitioner.Shaukat Rauf Siddiqui, Additional A.G., Punjab with M. Aslam Gondal, Inspector Gujrat for
Respondents.
FARAZ NAVEEDvsDISTRICT POLICE OFFICER GUJRAT and another
Law: Punjab Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975
Section: 2(iii),6
Law: Police Order (22 of 2002)
Section: 3,4
Law: Petroleum Act, 1934
Section: 14.4,16.3
(a) Punjab Police (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975--- ----Rr. 2(iii), 6---Police Order, 2002, Arts. 3, 4---Police Rules, 1934, Rr. 14.4, 16.3---Concurrent criminal and disciplinary proceedings against a police official accused of violent and brutal murder of an innocent citizen---Accused-police official (petitioner) was convicted and sentenced to death by the Anti-Terrorism Court but the High Court acquitted him from the charge on basis of benefit of doubt---Question was whether after such acquittal, the petitioners dismissal from service was justified---Held, that after proper inquiry, the petitioner was found guilty in a heinous crime and he was rightly dismissed from service---If the acquittal was found as a result of extending benefit of doubt or some other technical reasons, there was no bar for initiation of departmental enquiry and it was the prerogative rather an onerous responsibility of the employer to consider nature of offence for an appropriate action interdepartmentally---Criminal proceedings and disciplinary proceedings have distinctive characteristics and attributes with regard to the standard of proof---Strict proof beyond reasonable doubt” is required in a criminal trial, whereas for departmental inquiry, the standard of proof is that of “balance of probabilities” or “preponderance of evidence”---Prosecution in the criminal cases as well as the departmental inquiry on the same allegations can be conducted and continued concurrently at both venues without having any overriding or overlapping effect---Object of criminal trial is to mete out punishment of the offences committed by the accused while departmental inquiry is inaugurated to enquire into the allegations of misconduct in order to keep up and maintain the discipline and decorum in the institution and efficiency of department to strengthen and preserve public confidence---Petition for leave to appeal was dismissed and leave was refused with the observations that the police force is a disciplined force with cumbersome accountability and responsibility of maintaining law and public order in the society and populace, therefore, any person who wants to be part of the disciplined force…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492