Case Details

Citation(s)
2020 SLG 1739 2020 SLD 1739 2020 PLC 688

W.P. No. 898 of 2020, heard on 19-02-2020
SHAHID, JAMIL KHAN, JUSTICE
Muhammad Atif Qureshi for Petitioner. Jam Muhammad Afzal Gasoora, Assistant Advocate General Punjab assisted by Dr. Ghulam Yaseen Sabir, Chief Executive Officer, DHA, Bahawalpur. Muhammad Tahir Saeed Ramay for
Respondent No. 6.

DR. FATIMA ARSHAD

VS

GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Law: Punjab Civil Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975)

Section: 10

Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973

Section: 4,10A,19A

Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974)--- ----S. 10---Constitution of Pakistan, Arts. 4, 10A & 19A---Appointment on ad hoc basis for one year or till availability of regular incumbent---Verbal termination of petitioner on transfer of regular incumbent---Due process---Scope---Contention of petitioner was that impugned verbal termination order was against law---Validity---Appointment on ad hoc basis was temporary in nature which was liable to termination on appointment of regular incumbent---Appointment of a person on the recommendation of selection authority during the tenure of ad hoc appointment was sine qua non---Respondent had been appointed prior to the appointment of petitioner and not during the tenure of one year---Authority even on appointment of regular incumbent was bound to serve a thirty days notice or pay in lieu thereof---Such notice was to contain the information of appointment of regular incumbent against the vacancy and an intimation of termination within thirty days from the date of notice---Termination in alternative with immediate effect was to be communicated with pay in lieu thereof---Due process and disclosure of necessary information in a notice or show-cause notice was Fundamental Right of the recipient of the notice---Any action taken on a notice or a show cause notice lacking due process or necessary information would be susceptible to judicial review in constitutional jurisdiction and liable to be set aside---Impugned action of reliving the petitioner verbally on simple transfer of a regular employee being not an incumbent appointed against the vacant post was declared in violation of express provisions of law---Statutory rights even temporary could not be taken away in violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Arts. 4, 10A & 19A of the Constitution---Petitioner had statutory right though temporary to serve for one year unless a regular incumbent was appointed on recommendation of selection authority and that too on service of a written notice for thirty days or pay in lieu thereof---Impugned order passed by the authority was set aside---Petitioner would continue to serve unless her service was terminated in…
πŸ”’
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492