| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2022 SLG 2309 2022 SLD 2309 2022 SCMR 1882 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Criminal Appeal No. 398 of 2020, decided on 31st May, 2022.
IJAZ UL AHSAN, MUNIB AKHTAR AND SAYYED MAZAHAR ALI AKBAR NAQVI, JJ
Muhammad Ahsan Bhoon, Advocate Supreme Court, Syed Ali Imran, Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant.Ahmed Raza Gillani, Additional P.G. for the State.
Criminal Appeal No. 398 of 2020, decided on 31st May, 2022.
IJAZ UL AHSAN, MUNIB AKHTAR AND SAYYED MAZAHAR ALI AKBAR NAQVI, JJ
Muhammad Ahsan Bhoon, Advocate Supreme Court, Syed Ali Imran, Advocate Supreme Court and Syed Rifaqat Hussain Shah, Advocate-on-Record for Appellant.Ahmed Raza Gillani, Additional P.G. for the State.
SAJID MEHMOODvsThe STATEAhmed Raza Gillani, Additional P.G. for the State.
Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section: 302(b)
(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Reappraisal of evidence---Prosecution witnesses were subjected to lengthy cross-examination by the defence but nothing favourable to the accused or adverse to the prosecution could be produced on record---Ocular account furnished by the prosecution was reliable, straightforward and confidence inspiring---Both prosecution witnesses were inmates of the house, in front of which occurrence took place, therefore, their presence was natural and the same was fully established from the record---Medical evidence available on the record corroborated the ocular account so far as the nature, time and impact of the injury on the person of the deceased was concerned---Counsel for the accused could not point out any plausible reason as to why the complainant would falsely involve the accused in the present case and let off the real culprit, who had committed murder of his real brother---Substitution in such like cases was a rare phenomenon---According to the report of the Forensic Science Labo-ratory, the crime empty was found fired from the pistol recovered from the accused---Conviction of accused under section 302(b), P.P.C. was maintained---Appeal was dismissed. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)---Qatl-i-amd---Medical evidence and ocular account---Preference---Where ocular evidence is found trustworthy and confidence inspiring, the same is given preference over medical evidence---Casual discrepancies and conflicts appearing in medical evidence and the ocular version are quite possible for variety of reasons---During an incident when live shots are being fired, witnesses in a momentary glance make only tentative assessment of points where such fire shots appear to land and it becomes highly improbable to mention their location with exactitude. (c) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 302(b)--- Qatl-i-amd---Prosecution witnesses related to the deceased---Mere relationship of the prosecution witnesses with the deceased cannot be a ground to discard the testimony of such witnesses unless previous enmity or ill will is established on the record to falsely implicate the accused in the case. (d) Penal Code…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492