| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2021 SLG 2360 2021 SLD 2360 2021 PLD 756 |
Supreme Court of Pakistan
Civil Petitions Nos. 1128 to 1135 and 1920 of 2020 decided on 17th March, 2021, Date of hearing: 17th March, 2021.
UMAR ATA BANDIAL, JUSTICE, SAJJAD ALI SHAH, JUSTICE, MUNIB AKHTAR, JUSTICE
Sattar Awan, Spl. Prosecutor NAB (video link Karachi) for Petitioners. Shahab Sarki, Advocate Supreme Court, Altaf Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court and Aftab Alam Yasir, Advocate Supreme Court for
Respondents.
Civil Petitions Nos. 1128 to 1135 and 1920 of 2020 decided on 17th March, 2021, Date of hearing: 17th March, 2021.
UMAR ATA BANDIAL, JUSTICE, SAJJAD ALI SHAH, JUSTICE, MUNIB AKHTAR, JUSTICE
Sattar Awan, Spl. Prosecutor NAB (video link Karachi) for Petitioners. Shahab Sarki, Advocate Supreme Court, Altaf Hussain, Advocate Supreme Court and Aftab Alam Yasir, Advocate Supreme Court for
Respondents.
NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU THROUGH CHAIRMAN AND ANOTHER
VS
AGHA SIRAJ KHAN DURRANI AND 8 OTHERS
Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)
Section: 497,498
Law: National Accountability Ordinance, 1999
Section: 9,9(b)
(a) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S. 497---National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), S.9(b)---Corruption and corrupt practices---Post-arrest bail, grant of---Scope---In National Accountability Bureau (NAB) references/cases the concession of post-arrest bail could be granted to an accused on the basis of principles applicable to S.497, Cr.P.C. Olas Khan v. NAB PLD 2018 SC 40 ref. (b) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----Ss. 497 498---National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), S.9---Corruption and corrupt practices---Post-arrest and pre-arrest bail granted by High Court without considering the criteria under S.497(2), Cr.P.C.---Held, that rather than addressing the considerations/ criteria for bail provided under S.497(2), Cr.P.C, the High Court granted post-arrest bail to accused by focusing wholly on the alleged procedural and legal lapses committed by National Accountability Bureau (NAB) in the defective and perfunctory investigation carried out against the accused---High Court ought to have perused the incriminating material, if any, on the record to evaluate whether the two-fold test for grant of post-arrest bail, provided in S.497(2), Cr.P.C, was satisfied---High Court failed to apply its judicial mind to the said applicable criteria and the relevant material, thereby committing a serious error---Similarly while granting pre-arrest bail to co-accused persons the High Court barely touched upon the case against them, and instead relief of anticipatory bail was predominantly granted to them because they were treated as the front men of accused, who had already been extended bail---Confirming the extraordinary relief of pre-arrest bail to co-accused persons on a cursory basis contravened the settled principles (on bail) laid down by the Superior Courts---Impugned s of the High Court, whereby post-arrest and pre-arrest bails were granted to accused and co-accused persons respectively, were set-aside and matter was remanded to the High Court for a fresh decision in accordance with the settled law of bail---Petitions for leave to appeal were converted into appeals and allowed. (c) Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)--- ----S.…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492