Case Details

Citation(s)
2023 SLG 1036 2023 SLD 1036 2023 CLC 735
Lahore High Court
Criminal Appeals Nos. 23157, 24016 and Murder Reference No.88 of 2019, decided on 9th March, 2022 Date of hearing:9th March, 2022..
SARDAR MUHAMMAD SARFRAZ DOGAR AND SARDAR AHMED NAEEM, JJ

ANJUM LATIFVSThe STATE and another

Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 302,337-A(i),337-F(iv),337-L(2),148,149

(a) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302, 337-A(i), 337-F(iv), 337-L(2), 148 149---Qatl-i-amd, shajjah-i-khafifah, ghayr-jaifah-mudihah, hurt, rioting armed with deadly weapon, unlawful assembly---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Related witnesses---Accused was charged that he along with his co-accused while armed with pistols and iron rods caused injuries to three persons, out of which one person died---Statement of a witness related to deceased should be corroborated rather the statement of a worst enemy could be relied upon, if it inspired confidence and intrinsic worth of the statement was not shaken---Mere relationship of the witnesses with the deceased was not a ground for discarding their statements when otherwise such statements were confidence inspiring and found corroboration from the independent witnesses---Circumstances established that the prosecution had failed to prove its case against the accused persons beyond shadow of doubt---Accused were acquitted by setting aside conviction and sentences recorded by the Trial Court. (b) Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302, 337-A(i), 337-F(iv), 337-L(2), 148 149---Qatl-i-amd, shajjah-i-khafifah, ghayr-jaifah-mudihah, hurt, rioting armed with deadly weapon, unlawful assembly---Appreciation of evidence---Benefit of doubt---Contradictions in the statements of eye-witnesses---Effect---Accused was charged that he along with his co-accused while armed with pistols and iron rods caused injuries to three persons, out of which one person died---Injured witnesses claimed to have been severely beaten by the accused persons but no such torture/beating was borne out from the available record---Injured eye-witnesses were at variance regarding material points---One of the injured witnesses described that accused fired at the deceased hitting on his right temporal region which was contradicted by medical evidence---Moreover, other injured witness admitted that at the time of occurrence, his brother, complainant was not with them---Circumstances established that the prosecution had failed to prove its case against the accused persons beyond shadow of doubt---Accused were acquitted by setting aside…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492