Case Details

Citation(s)
2023 SLG 474 2023 SLD 474 2023 PCRLJ 285
Balochistan High Court
Criminal Revision No. 20 of 2021, decided on 24th May, 2021. Date of hearing: 19th May, 2021.
ABDUL HAMEED BALOCH, J
Sultan Khalid for Petitioner. Muhammad Sadiq Kakar for the Complainant. Miss Shumaila Iftikhar for the State.

MUHAMMAD ANWAR---Petitioner

VERSUS

The STATE-----Respondent

Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)

Section: 302,147,148,149

Law: Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)

Section: 512

Law: Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)

Section: 47

Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----Ss. 302, 147, 148, 149---Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 512---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 47---Qatl-i-amd, rioting, rioting armed with deadly weapons, unlawful assembly---Transposition of statement in subsequent trial---Effect---Complainant/petitioner had implored for transposition of the statement of a witness recorded earlier in the case because of his death---Said application was accepted by the Trial Court---Validity---As per S. 353, Cr.P.C., the evidence should be taken in the presence of accused, if the presence of accused was dispensed with by the competent court, then the statement of witness was to be recorded in the presence of his pleader---If the Trial Court recorded the statement of witnesses in absence of accused, on arrest of accused the court should record the statement of witnesses de novo, provided that such witness was alive---If the witnesses was/were found dead, incapable of giving evidence or his attendance could not be procured without delay or expense then evidence of such witness could be considered---Object of S. 512, Cr.P.C., was to exclude the possibility of lost of evidence or preserve the statement recorded during abscondence of accused---Section 512, Cr.P.C. and Art. 47 of Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984, empowered the court to believe the evidence of a witness if it had been recorded in absence of accused, provided that on arrest of accused, the witness had died or incapable to give evidence or his attendance could not be procured without an amount of delay---Under the said provisions, the protection was given to the deposition of such witnesses who were not alive or incapable to give evidence or their attendance could not be procured without an amount of delay---From the perusal of record, the case fell within the eventualities mentioned in S. 512, Cr.P.C., as the referred witness had died---Contention of petitioner that under S. 353, Cr.P.C., the statement of witness should be recorded in presence of accused had no force---Sections 353, 512, Cr.P.C. and Art. 47 of the Qanun-e-Shahadat, 1984, were to be read conjointly not in isolation---Section 512, Cr.P.C., empowered the court to record…
🔒
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492