Case Details

Citation(s)
2020 SLG 891 2020 SLD 891 2020 CLD 433
Competition Commission of Pakistan
F. No. 89/PFMA/C&TA/CCP/2016, decided on 13th December,2019, Dates of hearing: 29th March, 2018, 20th and 29thAugust, 2019.
MS. VADIYYA KHALIL, CHAIRPERSON, DR. SHAHZAD ANSAR DR. MUHAMMAD SALEEM, MEMBERS
Hamood ur Rehman Awan, Advocate Supreme Court for Mr. Pakistan Flour Mills Association (PFMA).Abdul Jalil, Director Food for Mr. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Food Department.Zahid Qaisar, Director Purchases for Punjab Food Department.Nemo for Balochistan Food

ASSOCIATION (PFMA): IN THE MATTER OF

Law: Competition Act, 2010

Section: 2(1)(q),4,38

(a) Competition Act (XIX of 2010)--- ----S. 2(1)(q)---Terms 'association' and 'association of undertakings'---Scope---Notice was issued to Pakistan Flour Mills Association (PFMA) for anti-competitive practices in market---Objection raised by PFMA was that proceedings against it were not maintainable as it was not an undertaking---Validity---Term 'association' could be of a natural person or legal persons for social causes or economic purposes---For an association to be an undertaking it was to be performing economic functions, i.e., it was engaged in provision of goods or services---For an 'association of undertakings' Legislature had not prescribed any condition---Plain and ordinary language of S. 2(1)(q) of Competition Act, 2010 provided that it should be an association of 'undertakings'---Where members were 'undertakings' within meaning of S. 2(1)(q) of Competition Act, 2010 it was deemed to be an association of undertakings---PFMA was an association of flour millers who were undertakings engaged in production and supply of wheat flour and all other products which were extracted from grinding of wheat--- PFMA was an "association of undertakings" and was therefore an "undertaking" in terms of S. 2(1)(q) of Competition Act, 2010---Proceedings against PFMA were maintainable under circumstances. (b) Competition Act (XIX of 2010)--- ----Ss. 4 & 38---Anti-competitive practices---Show cause notice, issuance of---Imposition of fine---State Compulsion, doctrine of---Regulatory Conduct Defense---Applicability---Notice was issued to Pakistan Flour Mills Association (PFMA) for anti-competitive practices in market---Contention of authorities was that State Compulsion Doctrine or Regulatory Conduct Defense was not available to Association---Validity---PFMA was not requiring its members to comply with maximum cap determined by Government, in fact, PFMA was fixing one price for all millers and circulating same for compliance---By giving instructions to sell wheat flour at a fixed price, PFMA primarily took away bargaining power from retailers and consumers, vis-a-vis sale and purchase of wheat flour independently---Choice of different prices was not made available to end…
πŸ”’
Continue readingLogin or create an account to access the complete content.Login / Register

Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492