| Citation(s) |
|---|
| 2020 SLG 1241 2020 SLD 1241 2020 PCRLJ 1179 |
Islamabad High Court
Criminal Revision No. 39 of 2014, decided on 12th February, 2020, Date of hearing: 30th January, 2020.
GHULAM AZAM QAMBRANI, JUSTICE
Ch. Muhammad Junaid Akhtar for Petitioner along with Petitioner in person. Malik Mazhar Javed, State counsel and Zohaib Hassan Gondal, State counsel with Faiz, SI for the State.
Criminal Revision No. 39 of 2014, decided on 12th February, 2020, Date of hearing: 30th January, 2020.
GHULAM AZAM QAMBRANI, JUSTICE
Ch. Muhammad Junaid Akhtar for Petitioner along with Petitioner in person. Malik Mazhar Javed, State counsel and Zohaib Hassan Gondal, State counsel with Faiz, SI for the State.
MUHAMMAD ABID FAROOQ
VS
THE STATE AND ANOTHERS
Law: Penal Code (XLV of 1860)
Section: 489-F
Law: Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984)
Section: 133
Law: Constitution of Pakistan, 1973
Section: 10-A
Penal Code (XLV of 1860)--- ----S. 489-F---Qanun-e-Shahadat (10 of 1984), Art. 133---Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 10-A---Dishonouring of cheque---Appreciation of evidence---Right of fair trial---Cross examination---Non-availability of advocate---Direction of High Court---Effect---Accused was convicted by Trial Court for issuing a cheque which was dishonoured on presentation and he was sentenced to imprisonment for three years---Conviction and sentence was maintained by Lower Appellate Court---Validity---Accused was unaware of the art of cross-examination and testimony of witnesses could not be tested properly---Testing the veracity and credibility of witnesses was a legal right of accused which could be achieved through proper cross-examination---High Court had issued direction for conclusion of trial but spirit of the order was meant only for a speedy conclusion of trial and not to deprive accused of his right of fair trial---Time could have been requested and extended in the interest of justice---Rights of accused persons were guaranteed under the Constitution and the very right of cross examination by counsel for proper defending was infringed---High Court set aside conviction and sentence awarded to accused and case was remanded to Trial Court for decision afresh---Revision was allowed accordingly. Abdul Ghafoor v. The State 2011 SCMR 23 rel. JUDGMENT GHULAM AZAM QAMBRANI, JUSTICE:---.---Through this Criminal Revision Petition, the petitioner/convict has assailed the order dated 12.02.2014 passed by the learned Sessions Judge-West, Islamabad and the impugned judgment dated 29.11.2013 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, Section-30, Islamabad-West, whereby he was convicted in case FIR No. 40, dated 23.1.2013 under section 489-F, P.P.C. and was sentenced to Rigorous imprisonment for three years and fine amounting to Rs. 50,000/- and in default of payment of fine the accused have to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months. Benefit under section 382-B, Cr.P.C. was also extended to the convict/petitioner. 2. Brief facts of the case are that Syed Amjad Hussain Shah/complainant lodged a complaint with P.S Kohsar alleging therein that he…
Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /home/digixyei/sldsystempk.com/view/master-layout/view_case.php on line 492